Abstract
2 Abstract: In order to sustainable production of corn by seed inoculation with Mycorrhiza strains a factorial field experiment was conducted during 2010-2011. Studied factors were Mycorrhiza strains (Glomus intraradics and G. mosseice) and phosphorous fertilization included 33%, 67% and 100% of recommended dose of super phosphate triple. There was a field with neither inoculation with Mycorrhiza nor phosphorous fertilization as control. Results revealed that the effects of Mycorrhiza strains and phosphorous fertilization on crop height were significant. When seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains, corn plants were taller than non- treated ones. The corn seeds inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseice had higher LAI than check plants. Maximum LAI obtained from crop plants fertilized with 67% recommended dose of phosphorous and these plants could improve their LAI up to 3.65. In non-inoculated seeds with increasing of phosphorous fertilization rate grain yield improved, significantly and yield produced in 100% recommended dose of phosphorous was nearly 6.43 tha . Whereas, in those seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains and fertilized with 67% 1 recommended dose of phosphorous, yield improved 31%. Higher grain phosphorous content was observed in treatments of 67% recommended dose of phosphorous plus inoculated seeds. Increasing of grain phosphorous content in non-biofertilized seeds experiencd linear trend with increasing of phosphorous application rate. Corn seeds biofertilization with both G. intraradics and G. mosseice Mycorrhiza strains may reduce in phosphorous fertilizer application rate in semi-arid regions and it can be resulting in reduction of fertilizers environmental hazards in sustainable maize production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
the effects of Mycorrhiza strains and phosphorous fertilization on crop height were significant
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- Mycorrhiza strains and phosphorous fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- crop heighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“the effects of Mycorrhiza strains and phosphorous fertilization on crop height were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
When seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains, corn plants were taller than non- treated ones.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strainse0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhiza strainse0
- Outcome
- corn plantse0
- Direction
- tallere0
- Comparator
- non- treated onese0
Not reportedInteractor role
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“When seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains, corn plants were taller than non- treated ones.”
Claim · model-written summary
The corn seeds inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseice had higher LAI than check plants.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with G. intraradicse0
- Outcome
- LAIe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- check plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“The corn seeds inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseice had higher LAI than check plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The corn seeds inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseice had higher LAI than check plants.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseicee0
- Outcome
- LAIe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- check plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“The corn seeds inoculated with G. intraradics and G. mosseice had higher LAI than check plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum LAI obtained from crop plants fertilized with 67% recommended dose of phosphorous and these plants could improve their LAI up to 3.65.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- 67% recommended dose of phosphorouse0
- Outcome
- LAIe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 3.65e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“Maximum LAI obtained from crop plants fertilized with 67% recommended dose of phosphorous and these plants could improve their LAI up to 3.65.”
Claim · model-written summary
In non-inoculated seeds with increasing of phosphorous fertilization rate grain yield improved, significantly
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- increasing of phosphorous fertilization ratee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“In non-inoculated seeds with increasing of phosphorous fertilization rate grain yield improved, significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
yield produced in 100% recommended dose of phosphorous was nearly 6.43 tha
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of phosphorouse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 6.43 thae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“yield produced in 100% recommended dose of phosphorous was nearly 6.43 tha”
Claim · model-written summary
in those seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains and fertilized with 67% 1 recommended dose of phosphorous, yield improved 31%
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains and fertilized with 67% 1 recommended dose of phosphorouse0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhiza strainse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 31%e0
Not reportedInteractor roleComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“in those seeds inoculated with Mycorrhiza strains and fertilized with 67% 1 recommended dose of phosphorous, yield improved 31%”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher grain phosphorous content was observed in treatments of 67% recommended dose of phosphorous plus inoculated seeds.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- 67% recommended dose of phosphorous plus inoculated seedse0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhiza strainse1
- Outcome
- grain phosphorous contente0
- Direction
- Highere0
Not reportedInteractor roleComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“Higher grain phosphorous content was observed in treatments of 67% recommended dose of phosphorous plus inoculated seeds.”
e1“the effects of Mycorrhiza strains and phosphorous fertilization on crop height were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing of grain phosphorous content in non-biofertilized seeds experiencd linear trend with increasing of phosphorous application rate.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- increasing of phosphorous application ratee0
- Outcome
- grain phosphorous contente0
- Direction
- Increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“Increasing of grain phosphorous content in non-biofertilized seeds experiencd linear trend with increasing of phosphorous application rate.”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →mycorrhiza · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
125 papers more in this group
See all 129 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
184 papers more in this group
See all 188 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
695 papers more in this group
See all 699 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.