Paper · 2012 · Advances in Applied Science Research

Assessment of salinity tolerance of different promising lines of bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)

Maryam Asadi; Ghasem Mohammadi‐Nejad; Pooran Golkar; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Evaluation of 342 synthetic lines of bread wheat w ith three ones of control (Arg, Bam, Kavir) at sali nity and normal conditions was carried out during the 2009-2010 in Iran. Salt tolerance indices including: Stress Tol erance Index (STI), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Tolerance Index (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP) and Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) were calculated. Result of toler ance indices showed that GMP and STI indices were appropriate indices to identify tolerant lines in salinity stress. On the basis of these indices, 12 lines including (10, 32, 74, 86, 92, 98,114, 191,188, 297, 300, 326) wer e identified as the most tolerance lines. There wer e significant differences among evaluated lines and control lines for seed yield. The highest values for seed yield were observed in Arg and lines number of 5, 10, 32, 74, 95, 86, 9 8,115,117, 120, 118, 143,147,149,152, 176, 216,223, 225, 301,313 and 358 in saline condition. This study showed that salinity stress had significant effect on seed yield reduction of some genotypes. Therefore, selection of salt tolera nce genotypes with consideration of their indices (GMP and STI) could be a good strategy for improvement of sa lt tolerance genotypes in bread wheat. It could be resulted that synthetic lines of 10, 32, 74, 86, 92,98, 114,188, 191, 297,300, 326 that had more seed yield than co ntrol varieties of Arg, Bam and Kavir, were identified as the promi sing lines for wheat breeding programs .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GMP and STI were suitable indices to identify salt-tolerant lines.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
appropriate indices to identify tolerant linese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GMP and STI indices were appropriate indices to identify tolerant lines in salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve lines were identified as most salt tolerant.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
12 linese0
Outcome
most tolerance linese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12 lines including (10, 32, 74, 86, 92, 98,114, 191,188, 297, 300, 326) wer e identified as the most tolerance lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield differed significantly among wheat lines and controls.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Comparator
control linese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences among evaluated lines and control lines for seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arg and listed synthetic lines had the highest seed yields under saline conditions.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Arge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in saline conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values for seed yield were observed in Arg and lines number of 5, 10, 32, 74, 95, 86, 9 8,115,117, 120, 118, 143,147,149,152, 176, 216,223, 225, 301,313 and 358 in saline condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress significantly reduced seed yield in some genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
some genotypese0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress had significant effect on seed yield reduction of some genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed selection using GMP and STI to improve salt tolerance.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
selection of salt tolera nce genotypes with consideration of their indices (GMP and STI)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selection of salt tolera nce genotypes with consideration of their indices (GMP and STI) could be a good strategy for improvement of sa lt tolerance genotypes in bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve synthetic lines yielded more than control varieties and were proposed for breeding.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
synthetic lines of 10, 32, 74, 86, 92,98, 114,188, 191, 297,300, 326e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
co ntrol varieties of Arg, Bam and Kavire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“synthetic lines of 10, 32, 74, 86, 92,98, 114,188, 191, 297,300, 326 that had more seed yield than co ntrol varieties of Arg, Bam and Kavir, were identified as the promi sing lines for wheat breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–98 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.