Paper · 2015 · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)

What are the effects of chlormequat and trinexapac-ethyl alone or in combina- tion on lodging, height and yield of winter wheat in Tasmania?

Angela Merry; Geoff Dean; Tina Acuña; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the High Rainfall Zone (HRZ) irrigation and high rates of applied nitrogen fertiliser may increase therisk of lodging in winter wheat. Crop lodging can limit crop productivity through interfering with water andassimilate supply to the developing grain. Lodging can also interfere with harvest ranging from slowingharvest operation through to total crop loss when lodging is severe. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) mimicor alter production of plant hormones and thus regulate plant growth and development and are used as aninsurance measure against lodging. In some instances, PGRs have been reported to increase yield irrespectiveof whether lodging has occurred. Experiments were conducted on winter wheat cvs. Brennan and Revenueover four seasons (2009-2012) in northern Tasmania. Crops were treated with varying rates, combinationsand timings of chlormequat (CCC) and trinexapac-ethyl (TE). Experiments evaluated the individual andcombined effects of these two PGRs on height and grain yield. PGRs treatments reduced height in mostyears, for example in 2012 the combined treatment of CCC and TE applied at early stem elongation had thegreatest height reduction, decreasing plant height by 17% compared with the control. No lodging occurred inany year. PGRs increased yield in some years, for instance in 2012, CCC applied at mid tillering and earlystem elongation increased yield by 7.5 and 4.1% respectively compared with the control. The results indicatethat both TE and CCC alone and in combination can decrease lodging risk and in some seasons PGRs mayincrease yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat and trinexapac-ethyl treatments reduced plant height of winter wheat in most years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
PGRse1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGRs treatments reduced height in most years”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 997–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined CCC and TE treatment at early stem elongation gave the greatest height reduction of winter wheat in 2012, 17% below the control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined treatment of CCC and TE applied at early stem elongatione2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
decreasinge2
Value
17%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“in 2012 the combined treatment of CCC and TE applied at early stem elongation had the greatest height reduction, decreasing plant height by 17% compared with the control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1054–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC applied at mid tillering increased winter wheat yield by 7.5% compared with the control in 2012.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CCC applied at mid tilleringe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
7.5e3
Qualifier
in 2012e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“in 2012, CCC applied at mid tillering and early stem elongation increased yield by 7.5 and 4.1% respectively compared with the control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1305–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC applied at early stem elongation increased winter wheat yield by 4.1% compared with the control in 2012.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CCCe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
4.1%e3
Qualifier
early stem elongatione3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“in 2012, CCC applied at mid tillering and early stem elongation increased yield by 7.5 and 4.1% respectively compared with the control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1305–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No lodging occurred in winter wheat in any year of the trials.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
lodginge4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e4

“No lodging occurred in any year”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1224–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TE and CCC alone and in combination can decrease lodging risk in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
TE and CCC alone and in combinatione5
Outcome
lodging riske5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat in Tasmania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–139 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicate that both TE and CCC alone and in combination can decrease lodging risk”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1440–1531 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 37 positive, 12 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Only trinexapac-ethyl and chlormequat reduced wheat plant height, relative to the control without retardant.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009 · compared with control treatment without growth retardant application

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

trinexapac-ethyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Only trinexapac-ethyl and chlormequat reduced wheat plant height, relative to the control without retardant.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009 · compared with control treatment without growth retardant application

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.