Paper · 2005 · Han'gug weon'ye haghoeji

Effects of Harvest Time and Peduncle Strength on Flower Opening and Vase Life after Dry Transport of Cut Rose

Jung Nam Suh; Kun Yang Huh; Wonhee Kim

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In cut rose flowers, long-lasting cultivar ‘Vital’ was compared with relatively short-lasting cultivars ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ with regard to their vase life, water relation, and peduncle strength depending on varied harvest time and simulated dry transport. Change in fresh weight initially showed rapid increase until 4 days after the vase life followed by gradual decrease at all treatments. Initial increase in fresh weight was higher for the flowers harvested at stage I (harvested when any sepal was not detached from the flower bud) compared with those harvested much later. Water balance of the flower stem steadily decreased with time elapsed, leading to negative value after 4 days of the experiment. Total water uptake of ‘Vital’ flowers was significantly higher than that of ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, irrespective of dry transport. When harvested at stage I, water uptake of ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ flowers were prominently affected by dry transport. Peduncle thickness and strength of ‘Vital’ flowers were thicker and stronger than those of the other cultivars, especially when harvested at stage I. In all cultivars, flower width decreased by dry transport harvested at all stages. The decrement of vase life by dry transport varied among 7, 19, and 12% in ‘Vital’, ‘Noblesse’, and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight rose rapidly until day four and then gradually fell across treatments.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
rapid increasee0
Qualifier
gradual decrease at all treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Change in fresh weight initially showed rapid increase until 4 days after the vase life followed by gradual decrease at all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowers harvested at stage I had a higher initial fresh-weight increase than later harvested flowers.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Organ / stage
stage Ie0
Outcome
Initial increase in fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
those harvested much latere0

Verbatim

e0

“Initial increase in fresh weight was higher for the flowers harvested at stage I (harvested when any sepal was not detached from the flower bud) compared with those harvested much later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower-stem water balance steadily declined and became negative after four days.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Outcome
Water balance of the flower steme0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
negative value after 4 days of the experimente0

Verbatim

e0

“Water balance of the flower stem steadily decreased with time elapsed, leading to negative value after 4 days of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vital flowers had significantly higher total water uptake than Noblesse and Suplesse, regardless of dry transport.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Vital’e0
Outcome
Total water uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
irrespective of dry transporte0
Comparator
‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’e0

Verbatim

e0

“Total water uptake of ‘Vital’ flowers was significantly higher than that of ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, irrespective of dry transport”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport prominently affected water uptake of stage I Noblesse flowers.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Noblesse’e0
Organ / stage
stage Ie0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
water uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When harvested at stage I, water uptake of ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ flowers were prominently affected by dry transport”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport prominently affected water uptake of stage I Suplesse flowers.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Suplesse’e0
Organ / stage
stage Ie0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
water uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When harvested at stage I, water uptake of ‘Noblesse’ and ‘Suplesse’ flowers were prominently affected by dry transport”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vital peduncles were thicker than those of the other cultivars, especially at stage I.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Vital’e0
Organ / stage
stage Ie0
Outcome
Peduncle thicknesse0
Direction
thickere0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“Peduncle thickness and strength of ‘Vital’ flowers were thicker and stronger than those of the other cultivars, especially when harvested at stage I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vital peduncles were stronger than those of other cultivars, especially at stage I.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Vital’e0
Organ / stage
stage Ie0
Outcome
strengthe0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“Peduncle thickness and strength of ‘Vital’ flowers were thicker and stronger than those of the other cultivars, especially when harvested at stage I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport reduced flower width across all cultivars and harvest stages.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
flower widthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
all cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In all cultivars, flower width decreased by dry transport harvested at all stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport shortened Vital vase life by 7%.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Vital’e0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
decremente0
Value
7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrement of vase life by dry transport varied among 7, 19, and 12% in ‘Vital’, ‘Noblesse’, and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport shortened Noblesse vase life by 19%.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Noblesse’e0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
decremente0
Value
19e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrement of vase life by dry transport varied among 7, 19, and 12% in ‘Vital’, ‘Noblesse’, and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry transport shortened Suplesse vase life by 12%.

Taxon
Cut Roset0
Material
‘Suplesse’e0
Treatment
dry transporte0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
decremente0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrement of vase life by dry transport varied among 7, 19, and 12% in ‘Vital’, ‘Noblesse’, and ‘Suplesse’ flowers, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cut Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–109 · show in text ↑