Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy ( kharif) season of 2010 and 2011 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and nutrient uptake in sor- ghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Two levels of farmyard manure (FYM) (0 and 10 tonnes/ha), four fertility lev- els based on soil test recommendation (0%, 50%, 75% and 100% NPK) and four biofertilizers (No inoculation, Azotobacter, phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and dual inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB) were compared. Application of 10 tonnes FYM/ha significantly increased grain (27.7, 28.3%) and stover (11.3, 12.9%) yields during both the years and as well as nutrient content (NPK) and their uptake over the control. Significant enhancement in grain (26.8 and 28.5%) and stover (11.9 and 13.0%) yields were observed with the application Azotobacter + PSB over no inoculation. Application of 100 % NPK increased grain (45.3 and 44.6%), stover (12.2 and 12.3%) yields and harvest index (22.9%) over the control. Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure at 10 tonnes/ha increased grain yield by 27.7% and 28.3% in the two years.
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 10 tonnes FYM/ha significantly increased grain (27.7, 28.3%) and stover (11.3, 12.9%) yields during both the years and as well as nutrient content (NPK) and their uptake over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure increased stover yield by 11.3% and 12.9%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 10 tonnes FYM/ha significantly increased grain (27.7, 28.3%) and stover (11.3, 12.9%) yields during both the years and as well as nutrient content (NPK) and their uptake over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure increased NPK nutrient content and uptake over control.
- Treatment
- 10 tonnes FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- nutrient content (NPK) and their uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 10 tonnes FYM/ha significantly increased grain (27.7, 28.3%) and stover (11.3, 12.9%) yields during both the years and as well as nutrient content (NPK) and their uptake over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus PSB increased grain yield by 26.8% and 28.5% over no inoculation.
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + PSBe0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
- Value
- 26.8 and 28.5%e0
- Comparator
- no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant enhancement in grain (26.8 and 28.5%) and stover (11.9 and 13.0%) yields were observed with the application Azotobacter + PSB over no inoculation.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus PSB increased stover yield by 11.9% and 13.0%.
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + PSBe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- stovere0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
- Value
- 11.9 and 13.0%e0
- Comparator
- no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant enhancement in grain (26.8 and 28.5%) and stover (11.9 and 13.0%) yields were observed with the application Azotobacter + PSB over no inoculation.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK increased grain yield by 45.3% and 44.6% over control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100 % NPK increased grain (45.3 and 44.6%), stover (12.2 and 12.3%) yields and harvest index (22.9%) over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK increased stover yield by 12.2% and 12.3%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100 % NPK increased grain (45.3 and 44.6%), stover (12.2 and 12.3%) yields and harvest index (22.9%) over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK increased harvest index by 22.9%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100 % NPK increased grain (45.3 and 44.6%), stover (12.2 and 12.3%) yields and harvest index (22.9%) over the control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved grain N content and uptake by 61.6%.
- Treatment
- 100% NPKe0
- Outcome
- N,P and K content and their uptake in graine0
- Direction
- Improvemente0
- Value
- 61.6e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved grain P content and uptake by 15.3%.
- Treatment
- 100% NPKe0
- Outcome
- content and their uptake in graine0
- Direction
- Improvemente0
- Value
- 15.3e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved grain K content and uptake by 22.0%.
- Treatment
- 100% NPKe0
- Outcome
- content and their uptake in graine0
- Direction
- Improvemente0
- Value
- 22.0%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved stover N content and uptake by 84.7%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved stover P content and uptake by 29.9%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK improved stover K content and uptake by 243.2%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improvement in N,P and K content and their uptake in grain (61.6, 15.3 and 22.0%) and stover (84.7, 29.9 and 243.2%) were also noticed with 100% NPK over control.”
t0“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →phosphorus · yield · SorghumResults differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
114 papers more in this group
See all 118 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.