Abstract
The present investigation entitled was carried out at the Instructional Dairy Research Farm, IGKVV, Raipur (C.G.) during Rabi season (October to December) of 2009. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replication. Forage sorghum “MP-Chari” with a seed rate of 40 kg ha-1 was sown on Oct 12, 2009 with a row spacing of 30 cm. Cutting of sorghum was done on Dec 12, 2009 at 60 DAS of crop. The results revealed that growth parameter like plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight of leaf, fresh weight of stem, fresh weight of plant, LAI, dry matter accumulation on leaf, stem and plant, leaf stem ratio and CGR were significantly higher in T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) as compare to other treatments and it was at par with T9 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1+Azospirillum) and T8 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter). Among all the treatments, T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) recorded significantly higher green and dry fodder yield over other treatments and it was at par with T8 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter) and T9 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1+ Azospirillum) and it may be due to cumulative effect of higher value recorded by these treatment for most of the yield contributing characters. Combination of inorganic fertilizer with biofertilizers significantly increased the overall growth and development of sorghum plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
T10 significantly increased plant height, leaf number and leaf fresh weight compared with other treatments and matched T8 and T9.
- Taxon
- Forage sorghumt0
- Treatment
- T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight of leafe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight of leaf, fresh weight of stem, fresh weight of plant, LAI, dry matter accumulation on leaf, stem and plant, leaf stem ratio and CGR were significantly higher in T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) as compare to other treatments and it was at par with T9 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1+Azospirillum) and T8 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter)”
t0“Forage Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 significantly increased stem and plant fresh weight and LAI compared with other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“fresh weight of stem, fresh weight of plant, LAI, dry matter accumulation on leaf, stem and plant, leaf stem ratio and CGR were significantly higher in T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) as compare to other treatments”
t0“Forage Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 significantly increased dry matter in leaf, stem and plant.
Verbatim
e0“dry matter accumulation on leaf, stem and plant, leaf stem ratio and CGR were significantly higher in T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) as compare to other treatments”
t0“Forage Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 significantly increased leaf stem ratio and CGR.
Verbatim
e0“leaf stem ratio and CGR were significantly higher in T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) as compare to other treatments”
t0“Forage Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 significantly increased green and dry fodder yields over other treatments and matched T8 and T9.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum) recorded significantly higher green and dry fodder yield over other treatments and it was at par with T8 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1 + Azotobacter) and T9 (100% RDN @ 60 kg ha−1+ Azospirillum)”
t0“Forage Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining inorganic fertilizer with biofertilizers significantly increased sorghum growth and development.
- Treatment
- Combination of inorganic fertilizer with biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- overall growth and developmente0
- Direction
- increasede0
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combination of inorganic fertilizer with biofertilizers significantly increased the overall growth and development of sorghum plant.”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Azotobacter · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Azospirillum · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Azospirillum · growth · SorghumResults agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.