Paper · 2012 · Agricultural Sciences

Moisture conservation practices and nutrient management on growth and yield of rabi sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in the Vertisols of peninsular India

Mudalagiriyappa; B. K. Ramachandrappa; H. V. Nanjappa

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of moisture conservation and nutrient management on growth and yield of rabi sorghum was studied at the Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Babbur Farm, Hiriyur Karnataka under rainfed conditions on medium black soil during rabi seasons of 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 Days After Sowing (DAS) proved superior over sowing across the slope and even ridges and furrows with tied ridging in terms of grain yield (1.10 t/ha), stover yield (1.51 t/ha) and 1000 grain weight (24.6 g). Similarly application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF + Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortia (Trichoderma, Azospirillum and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) recorded significantly higher plant height (121 cm), panicle length (8.7 cm), panicle diameter (7.4 cm), 1000 grain weight (24.3 g), grain yield (0.95 t/ha) and stover yield (1.42 t/ha) over other treatments but on par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 2.5 t/ha. Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 DAS was also superior with maximum output energy of 43350 MJ/ha, rainwater use efficiency of 5.15 Kg/ha/mm and BC ratio of 2.31. Similarly application of 50%RDF + FYM 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortia recorded higher output energy of 39525 MJ/ha and rainwater use efficiency of 4.48 Kg/ha/mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows were superior for grain yield, reaching 1.10 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 Days After Sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
1.10 t/hae0
Comparator
sowing across the slope and even ridges and furrows with tied ridginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 Days After Sowing (DAS) proved superior over sowing across the slope and even ridges and furrows with tied ridging in terms of grain yield (1.10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows were superior for stover yield, reaching 1.51 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Value
1.51 t/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield (1.51 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows were superior for thousand grain weight, reaching 24.6 g.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Value
24.6 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000 grain weight (24.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly increased plant height to 121 cm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF + Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortia (Trichoderma, Azospirillum and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
121 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF + Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortia (Trichoderma, Azospirillum and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) recorded significantly higher plant height (121 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher panicle length of 8.7 cm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Value
8.7 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle length (8.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher panicle diameter of 7.4 cm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
panicle diametere0
Value
7.4 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle diameter (7.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher thousand grain weight of 24.3 g.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Value
24.3 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000 grain weight (24.3 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher grain yield of 0.95 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
0.95 t/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (0.95 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher stover yield of 1.42 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Value
1.42 t/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield (1.42 t/ha) over other treatments but on par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows maximized output energy at 43350 MJ/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 DASe0
Outcome
output energye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
43350 MJ/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paired row planting (30-60-30 cm) and opening of furrow in wide rows at 35 DAS was also superior with maximum output energy of 43350 MJ/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows had rainwater use efficiency of 5.15 Kg/ha/mm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
rainwater use efficiencye0
Value
5.15 Kg/ha/mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainwater use efficiency of 5.15 Kg/ha/mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows and furrows had a BC ratio of 2.31.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
BC ratioe0
Value
2.31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BC ratio of 2.31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher output energy of 39525 MJ/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
application of 50%RDF + FYM 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortiae0
Outcome
output energye0
Direction
highere0
Value
39525 MJ/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50%RDF + FYM 2.5 t/ha + Microbial consortia recorded higher output energy of 39525 MJ/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment yielded higher rainwater use efficiency of 4.48 Kg/ha/mm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
rainwater use efficiencye0
Value
4.48 Kg/ha/mme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainwater use efficiency of 4.48 Kg/ha/mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · SorghumResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

phosphorus · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 68 positive, 8 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.