Paper · 2005 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of levels and application methods of irrigation and mulch materials on strawberry production in North-West Himalayas

Sushil Kumar; Ishwar Prakash Sharma; J. N. Raina

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during 1999–2001 at Nauni, Solan (H.P.) in a sandy loam Inceptisol to study the comparative effects of drip and surface irrigation, with and without mulch on irrigation requirement, yield, quality and water-use efficiency of ‘Chandlar’ strawberry (Fragaria ananassa). Drip irrigation at 1.0 ‘V’ volume of water (100% crop ET) gave significantly higher fruit yield (57.07 q ha−1) compared with the surface irrigation (47.17 q ha−1). Black polyethylene mulch plus drip irrigation further raised the yield to 78.63 q ha−1. Grass mulch (irrespective of irrigation methods) increased the fruit size, sugar content, TSS/acidity ratio and anthocyanin content as compared to BP mulch. However, TSS and acidity were maximum in rainfed un-mulched treatment. Average seasonal irrigation requirement of strawberry with drip irrigation but without mulch was 475 mm which decreased to 440 and 403 mm with grass and BP mulch. The corresponding values under surface irrigation were 696, 660 and 608 mm. Water-use efficiency under drip irrigation without mulch, drip plus grass mulch and drip plus BP mulch was 7.5, 8.8 and 11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively, whereas, respective values under surface irrigation were 4.7, 5.7 and 7.1 kg ha−1 mm−1. Drip irrigation, besides saving 51% irrigation water, resulted in about 19% higher fruit yield compared with the surface irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased yield relative to surface irrigation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Drip irrigation at 1.0 ‘V’ volume of water (100% crop ET)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.07 q ha−1e0
Qualifier
47.17 q ha−1e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation at 1.0 ‘V’ volume of water (100% crop ET) gave significantly higher fruit yield (57.07 q ha−1) compared with the surface irrigation (47.17 q ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch plus drip raised yield to 78.63 q ha−1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Black polyethylene mulch plus drip irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Value
78.63 q ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black polyethylene mulch plus drip irrigation further raised the yield to 78.63 q ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch increased fruit size and sugar content over BP mulch.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Grass mulche0
Outcome
fruit size, sugar content, TSS/acidity ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
BP mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grass mulch (irrespective of irrigation methods) increased the fruit size, sugar content, TSS/acidity ratio and anthocyanin content as compared to BP mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch increased anthocyanin content over BP mulch.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Grass mulche0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
BP mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grass mulch (irrespective of irrigation methods) increased the fruit size, sugar content, TSS/acidity ratio and anthocyanin content as compared to BP mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed unmulched plants had maximum TSS and acidity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
rainfed un-mulched treatmente0
Outcome
TSS and aciditye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS and acidity were maximum in rainfed un-mulched treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip without mulch required 475 mm seasonal irrigation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
drip irrigation but without mulche0
Outcome
Average seasonal irrigation requiremente0
Value
475 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average seasonal irrigation requirement of strawberry with drip irrigation but without mulch was 475 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch reduced drip irrigation requirement to 440 mm.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
grasse0
Outcome
irrigation requiremente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
440e0
Comparator
drip irrigation but without mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average seasonal irrigation requirement of strawberry with drip irrigation but without mulch was 475 mm which decreased to 440 and 403 mm with grass and BP mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP mulch reduced drip irrigation requirement to 403 mm.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
BP mulche0
Outcome
irrigation requiremente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
403 mme0
Comparator
drip irrigation but without mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average seasonal irrigation requirement of strawberry with drip irrigation but without mulch was 475 mm which decreased to 440 and 403 mm with grass and BP mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–945 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface irrigation requirements were 696, 660 and 608 mm for no, grass and BP mulch.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
surface irrigatione0
Outcome
corresponding valuese0
Value
696, 660 and 608 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding values under surface irrigation were 696, 660 and 608 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip without mulch achieved water-use efficiency of 7.5 kg ha−1 mm−1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
drip irrigation without mulche0
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye0
Value
7.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-use efficiency under drip irrigation without mulch, drip plus grass mulch and drip plus BP mulch was 7.5, 8.8 and 11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip plus grass mulch achieved water-use efficiency of 8.8 kg ha−1 mm−1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
drip plus grass mulche0
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye0
Value
8.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-use efficiency under drip irrigation without mulch, drip plus grass mulch and drip plus BP mulch was 7.5, 8.8 and 11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip plus BP mulch achieved water-use efficiency of 11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
drip plus BP mulche0
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye0
Value
11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-use efficiency under drip irrigation without mulch, drip plus grass mulch and drip plus BP mulch was 7.5, 8.8 and 11.4 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface irrigation water-use efficiency was 4.7, 5.7 and 7.1 kg ha−1 mm−1 for corresponding treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
surface irrigatione0
Outcome
respective valuese0
Value
4.7, 5.7 and 7.1 kg ha−1 mm−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas, respective values under surface irrigation were 4.7, 5.7 and 7.1 kg ha−1 mm−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation saved 51% irrigation water.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Drip irrigatione0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
51%e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation, besides saving 51% irrigation water, resulted in about 19% higher fruit yield compared with the surface irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation produced about 19% higher fruit yield than surface irrigation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Drip irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
about 19%e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation, besides saving 51% irrigation water, resulted in about 19% higher fruit yield compared with the surface irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mulching · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

97 papers: 78 positive, 19 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mulching · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.