Paper · 1985 · Plant Physiol.; (United States)

Cell wall yield properties of growing tissue: evaluation by in vivo stress relaxation. [Pisum sativus L]

Daniel J. Cosgrove

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growing pea stem tissue, when isolated from an external supply of water, undergoes stress relaxation because of continued loosening of the cell wall. A theoretical analysis is presented to show that such stress relaxation should result in an exponential decrease in turgor pressure down to the yield threshold (Y), with a rate constant given by phi epsilon where phi is the metabolically maintained irreversible extensibility of the cell wall and epsilon is the volumetric elastic modulus of the cell. Stress relaxation was measured in pea (Pisum sativus L.) stem segments using the pressure microprobe technique. From the rate of stress relaxation, phi of segments pretreated with water was calculated to be 0.08 per megapascal per hour while that of auxin-pretreated tissue was 0.24 per megapascal per hour. These values agreed closely with estimates of phi made by a steady-state technique. The yield threshold (0.29 megapascal) was not affected by auxin. A theoretical analysis is also presented to show that the tissue hydraulic conductance may be estimated from the T/sub 1/2/ of tissue swelling. Experimentally, pea stems had a swelling T/sub 1/2/ of 2.0 minutes, corresponding to a relative hydraulic conductance of about 2.0 per megapascal per hour. This value ismore » at least 8 times larger than phi. From these data and from computer modeling, it appears that the radial gradient in water potential which sustains water uptake in growing pea segments is small (0.04 megapascal). This means that hydraulic conductance does not substantially restrict growth. The results also demonstrate that the stimulation of growth by auxin can be entirely accounted for by the change in phi.« less

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea stem tissue isolated from external water undergoes stress relaxation through wall loosening.

Outcome
stress relaxatione0
Qualifier
continued loosening of the cell walle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growing pea stem tissue, when isolated from an external supply of water, undergoes stress relaxation because of continued loosening of the cell wall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-pretreated segments had phi of 0.08 per megapascal per hour.

Treatment
pretreated with watere0
Outcome
phie0
Value
0.08 per megapascal per houre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phi of segments pretreated with water was calculated to be 0.08 per megapascal per hour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin-pretreated segments had phi of 0.24 per megapascal per hour.

Treatment
auxin-pretreated tissuee0
Outcome
phie1
Value
0.24 per megapascal per houre0
Comparator
pretreated with watere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of auxin-pretreated tissue was 0.24 per megapascal per hour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“phi of segments pretreated with water was calculated to be 0.08 per megapascal per hour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–737 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea (Pisum sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin did not affect the yield threshold of 0.29 megapascal.

Treatment
auxine0
Outcome
yield thresholde0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
0.29 megapascale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield threshold (0.29 megapascal) was not affected by auxin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea stem swelling half-time was 2.0 minutes.

Outcome
swelling T/sub 1/2/e0
Value
2.0 minutese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pea stems had a swelling T/sub 1/2/ of 2.0 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative hydraulic conductance was about 2.0 per megapascal per hour.

Outcome
relative hydraulic conductancee0
Value
about 2.0 per megapascal per houre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corresponding to a relative hydraulic conductance of about 2.0 per megapascal per hour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The modeled radial water-potential gradient in growing pea segments was small, 0.04 megapascal.

Outcome
radial gradient in water potentiale0
Value
0.04 megapascale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the radial gradient in water potential which sustains water uptake in growing pea segments is small (0.04 megapascal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1490 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydraulic conductance was interpreted as not substantially restricting growth.

Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
hydraulic conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydraulic conductance does not substantially restrict growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1568 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea segments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1463 · show in text ↑

class · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.