Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFICACY OF COMMERCIALLY APPLIED 1-METHYLCYCLOPROPENE (1-MCP)

I.J. Crouch

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1-MCP, an inhibitor of ethylene perception, is applied commercially to deciduous crops to extend storage duration and improve shelf-life quality. The importance of harvest maturity and delays in commercial 1-MCP applications after harvest can be observed in fruit quality following cold storage and shelf life. Pack houses are continually looking to improve treatment efficacy and to develop knowledge of the benefits that they can expect after storage from this technology. This study was initiated to improve 1-MCP application guidelines. 'Golden Delicious' and 'Granny Smith' apples were harvested weekly from the beginning of the optimum picking window, until fruit were of a post optimum maturity. Fruit subjected to 625 μl/L 1-MCP, 1, 4, 7 and 14 days after harvest were cold stored with untreated fruit for 16 weeks at -0.5°C, followed by a shelf life of 7 days at 20°C. Immediately after each 1-MCP application, treated fruit were subjected to a 7 day ripening period at 20°C to determine the efficacy of the application. The importance of applying 1-MCP to 'Golden Delicious' apples as soon as possible after harvest was confirmed, and indicated storage and shelf life benefits when fruit are treated within 7 days of harvest. 1-MCP applied 14 days after harvest did not show any storage or shelf life benefits. Fruit not treated with 1-MCP were all below the UK supermarket grade of 56.9 N (5.8 kg force) after 16 weeks cold storage, regardless of harvest maturity. All fruit, treated with 1-MCP within 7 days of harvest, made the UK supermarket grade. 1-MCP applied to 'Granny Smith' apples up to 14 days after harvest maintained flesh firmness irrespective of harvest maturity, with all fruit making the supermarket grade of 66.7 N (6.8 kg force) after cold storage. However, superficial scald control was reduced when 1-MCP was applied more than 7 days after harvest. 1-MCP treated 'Granny Smith' apples did not soften during shelf life periods. Internal ethylene levels of 1-MCP treated fruit were an accurate indicator of treatment efficacy, storage potential, and the physiological ripening responses of 'Golden Delicious' and 'Granny Smith' apples following storage and shelf life. The significance of these findings is discussed, in terms of practical guidelines to 1-MCP application to 'Golden Delicious' and 'Granny Smith' apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Delicious apples benefited in storage and shelf life when treated within seven days of harvest.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e0
Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
storage and shelf life benefitse0
Qualifier
within 7 days of harveste0
Comparator
14 days after harveste1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Golden Delicious' apples as soon as possible after harvest was confirmed, and indicated storage and shelf life benefits when fruit are treated within 7 days of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP applied 14 days after harvest did not show any storage or shelf life benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP at fourteen days after harvest gave no storage or shelf life benefit.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e1
Treatment
1-MCP applied 14 days after harveste0
Outcome
storage or shelf life benefitse0
Direction
did not showe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP applied 14 days after harvest did not show any storage or shelf life benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Golden Delicious' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1091 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruit fell below the UK supermarket firmness grade after sixteen weeks of cold storage.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e1
Outcome
UK supermarket gradee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
56.9 Ne0
Qualifier
regardless of harvest maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit not treated with 1-MCP were all below the UK supermarket grade of 56.9 N (5.8 kg force) after 16 weeks cold storage, regardless of harvest maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Golden Delicious' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fruit treated within seven days met the UK supermarket grade.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e1
Treatment
1-MCP within 7 days of harveste0
Outcome
made the UK supermarket gradee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fruit, treated with 1-MCP within 7 days of harvest, made the UK supermarket grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Golden Delicious' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granny Smith apples treated up to fourteen days after harvest maintained flesh firmness and met the supermarket grade after storage.

Material
'Granny Smith'e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
66.7 Ne0
Qualifier
irrespective of harvest maturitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP applied to 'Granny Smith' apples up to 14 days after harvest maintained flesh firmness irrespective of harvest maturity, with all fruit making the supermarket grade of 66.7 N (6.8 kg force) after cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superficial scald control declined when 1-MCP was applied more than seven days after harvest.

Material
'Granny Smith'e1
Treatment
1-MCP was applied more than 7 days after harveste0
Outcome
superficial scald controle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superficial scald control was reduced when 1-MCP was applied more than 7 days after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1879 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP applied to 'Granny Smith' apples up to 14 days after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated Granny Smith apples did not soften during shelf life.

Material
'Granny Smith'e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
soften during shelf life periodse0
Direction
did not softene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP treated 'Granny Smith' apples did not soften during shelf life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1957 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internal ethylene levels accurately indicated treatment efficacy, storage potential and ripening responses in both apple cultivars.

Material
'Golden Delicious' and 'Granny Smith'e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
treatment efficacy, storage potential, and the physiological ripening responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Internal ethylene levels of 1-MCP treated fruit were an accurate indicator of treatment efficacy, storage potential, and the physiological ripening responses of 'Golden Delicious' and 'Granny Smith' apples following storage and shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2197 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.