Abstract
Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage, managing crop load at either 40 or 60 bunches/vine to reduce the incidence of water-berry development resulted in 58.54 (in crop load with 40 bunches/vine) to 38.50% (in trunk girdling); reduction in development of water berry in all the treatments over the control (80 bunches/vine). The treatments had no effect on bunch length and breadth, but bunch weight, berry length and breadth, acidity, brix, and yield/bunch were significantly improved. The rachis N content was reduced under all treatments and was positively correlated with the incidence of water berry in a bunch. The rachis K, Ca and Mg contents increased in all the treatments, showing a negative direct relationship with the incidence of water berry in grape bunches.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Crop load at 40 bunches per vine reduced water berry development relative to the control at 80 bunches per vine, by 58.54%.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- crop load with 40 bunches/vinee2
- Outcome
- development of water berrye3
- Direction
- reductione3
- Value
- 58.54e2
- Comparator
- control (80 bunches/vine)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e2“resulted in 58.54 (in crop load with 40 bunches/vine) to 38.50% (in trunk girdling)”
e3“reduction in development of water berry in all the treatments over the control (80 bunches/vine)”
Claim · model-written summary
Trunk girdling reduced water berry development relative to the control at 80 bunches per vine, by 38.50%.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- trunk girdlinge2
- Outcome
- development of water berrye3
- Direction
- reductione3
- Value
- 38.50%e2
- Comparator
- control (80 bunches/vine)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e2“resulted in 58.54 (in crop load with 40 bunches/vine) to 38.50% (in trunk girdling)”
e3“reduction in development of water berry in all the treatments over the control (80 bunches/vine)”
Claim · model-written summary
Berry thinning reduced water berry development relative to the control at 80 bunches per vine.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- development of water berrye3
- Direction
- reductione3
- Comparator
- control (80 bunches/vine)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e3“reduction in development of water berry in all the treatments over the control (80 bunches/vine)”
Claim · model-written summary
Girdling and berry thinning had no effect on bunch length and breadth.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- girdling at veraison, berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- bunch length and breadthe4
- Direction
- no effecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e4“The treatments had no effect on bunch length and breadth”
Claim · model-written summary
Girdling and berry thinning significantly improved bunch weight and berry length and breadth.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- girdling at veraison, berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- bunch weight, berry length and breadthe5
- Direction
- significantly improvede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e5“bunch weight, berry length and breadth, acidity, brix, and yield/bunch were significantly improved”
Claim · model-written summary
Girdling and berry thinning significantly improved acidity, brix and yield per bunch.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- girdling at veraison, berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- acidity, brix, and yield/bunche5
- Direction
- significantly improvede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e5“bunch weight, berry length and breadth, acidity, brix, and yield/bunch were significantly improved”
Claim · model-written summary
Rachis N content was reduced under all treatments.
- Material
- cv. Perlettee0
- Treatment
- girdling at veraison, berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- rachis N contente6
- Direction
- reducede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e6“The rachis N content was reduced under all treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Rachis N content was positively correlated with the incidence of water berry in a bunch.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e7“The rachis N content was reduced under all treatments and was positively correlated with the incidence of water berry in a bunch”
Claim · model-written summary
Rachis K, Ca and Mg contents increased under all treatments.
- Treatment
- girdling at veraison, berry thinninge1
- Outcome
- rachis K, Ca and Mg contentse2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“involving girdling at veraison, berry thinning (both at a crop load of 80 bunches/vine) and berry-set stage”
e2“The rachis K, Ca and Mg contents increased in all the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Rachis K, Ca and Mg contents showed a negative direct relationship with the incidence of water berry.
- Organ / stage
- rachise1
- Compound
- K, Ca and Mge1
- Outcome
- incidence of water berrye1
- Direction
- negative direct relationshipe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Study conducted on 9-year-old grapevines of cv. Perlette”
e1“The rachis K, Ca and Mg contents increased in all the treatments, showing a negative direct relationship with the incidence of water berry in grape bunches”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.