Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of integrated nutrient management on transplanted rice (Oryza sativa) and its residual effect on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop in rainfed lowlands

Gurbachan Singh; Sunil Kumar; Veerendra Kumar; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1995–97 at Ghaghraghat, Uttar Pradesh, to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on rice [Oryza sativa L) and residual effect on succeeding wheat [Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Application of 50% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha to rice gave significantly higher mean grain yield of rice (31.8 q/ha) and wheat (28.4 q/ha) over rest of the treatments except 50% RDN-IF+PM @ 5 tonnes/ha in rice. The yield of succeeding wheat increased by 43.1 to 48.9% because of integrated use over the control. Rice fertilized with 75% RDN through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + blue green algae (BGA @ 16 kg/ha) resulted in significantly higher grain yield over 75% RDN-IF+BGA @12 kg/ha during both the years. Application of ZnSO4 with full RDF resulted significantly higher yield of rice and succeeding wheat as compared to full RDF alone through inorganic fertilizers. There was a build-up of available N, P, K and organic carbon in soil in all integrated nutrient management practices except full RDF alone and RDF + ZnSO4. The bulk density and pH reduced under in all nutrient management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dhaincha-integrated treatment produced rice grain yield of 31.8 q/ha, significantly above most alternatives.

Treatment
50% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) @ 2.5 tonnes/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.8 q/hae0
Comparator
rest of the treatments except 50% RDN-IF+PM @ 5 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha to rice gave significantly higher mean grain yield of rice (31.8 q/ha) and wheat (28.4 q/ha) over rest of the treatments except 50% RDN-IF+PM @ 5 tonnes/ha in rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dhaincha-integrated treatment produced succeeding wheat grain yield of 28.4 q/ha.

Treatment
50% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) @ 2.5 tonnes/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
28.4 q/hae0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha to rice gave significantly higher mean grain yield of rice (31.8 q/ha) and wheat (28.4 q/ha) over rest of the treatments except 50% RDN-IF+PM @ 5 tonnes/ha in rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient use raised succeeding wheat yield 43.1 to 48.9% over the control.

Treatment
integrated usee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.1 to 48.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of succeeding wheat increased by 43.1 to 48.9% because of integrated use over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher blue-green-algae rate gave significantly higher rice yield.

Treatment
75% RDN through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + blue green algae (BGA @ 16 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75% RDN-IF+BGA @12 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice fertilized with 75% RDN through inorganic fertilizer (IF) + blue green algae (BGA @ 16 kg/ha) resulted in significantly higher grain yield over 75% RDN-IF+BGA @12 kg/ha during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 with full fertilizer increased rice yield over full fertilizer alone.

Treatment
ZnSO4 with full RDFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
full RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ZnSO4 with full RDF resulted significantly higher yield of rice and succeeding wheat as compared to full RDF alone through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 with full fertilizer increased succeeding wheat yield over full fertilizer alone.

Treatment
ZnSO4 with full RDFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
full RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ZnSO4 with full RDF resulted significantly higher yield of rice and succeeding wheat as compared to full RDF alone through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–120 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

145 papers: 144 positive, 1 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.