Paper · 2010 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effect of the Integrated Application of the Organic Fertilizer, Inorganic Fertilizer and Soil Regulator on Rice Yield

Jiang Gang; Li JingYong; Zhou Feng-yun; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The impact of the integrated application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer,the application of soil regulator on rice yield was experimented.[Method] The different treatments including application of different types of organic fertilizer or inorganic fertilizer,and the application of soil regulator or not were designed in the experiment.[Results] The organic fertilizer can promote rice tillering and its fertilizer efficiency was slowly released,which treating efficiency in the early growing period of rice was not better than that of chemical fertilizer,however,in the late growing period of rice,significantly better than that of chemical fertilizer.The rice average yield was gradually increased with the increment the proportion of organic fertilizer application,and the treatment of compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2 could promote the formation of the highest rice average yield of 8 724.30 kg/hm2,which was 6.7% higher than that of CK.The application of soil regulator was beneficial to rice yield-increasing and the average rice yield was up to 8 440.05 kg/hm2.[Conclusion] The organic fertilizer and soil regulator can promote rice growth and development for many more tillers and obvious yield-increasing.The integrated application of compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2 and soil regulator made the rice yield being the maximum one and the average yield was up to 8 791.95 kg/hm2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer promoted rice tillering.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
rice tilleringe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilizer can promote rice tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–421 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer efficiency was released slowly.

Outcome
fertilizer efficiencye0
Qualifier
slowly releasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its fertilizer efficiency was slowly released”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–471 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice yield was experimented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer was less effective than chemical fertilizer early in growth.

Organ / stage
early growing periode0
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
treating efficiencye0
Direction
not bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating efficiency in the early growing period of rice was not better than that of chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic fertilizer can promote rice tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer was significantly more effective than chemical fertilizer late in growth.

Organ / stage
late growing periode0
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
better thane0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the late growing period of rice,significantly better than that of chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–678 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic fertilizer can promote rice tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–421 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average rice yield increased with the organic fertilizer proportion.

Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice average yield was gradually increased with the increment the proportion of organic fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The compound fertilizer, AP and rice straw treatment had average rice yield 8 724.30 kg/hm2, 6.7% over CK.

Treatment
compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2e0
Outcome
rice average yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8 724.30 kg/hm2e0
Qualifier
6.7%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2 could promote the formation of the highest rice average yield of 8 724.30 kg/hm2,which was 6.7% higher than that of CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil regulator increased rice yield to 8 440.05 kg/hm2.

Treatment
soil regulatore0
Outcome
average rice yielde0
Direction
yield-increasinge0
Value
8 440.05 kg/hm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of soil regulator was beneficial to rice yield-increasing and the average rice yield was up to 8 440.05 kg/hm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizer and soil regulator produced the maximum rice yield of 8 791.95 kg/hm2.

Treatment
compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2 and soil regulatore0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8 791.95 kg/hm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated application of compound fertilizer of 75.0 kg/hm2 + AP of 22.5 kg/hm2 + dried rice straw of 4 000.0 kg/hm2 and soil regulator made the rice yield being the maximum one and the average yield was up to 8 791.95 kg/hm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer and soil regulator promoted tiller production.

Treatment
organic fertilizer and soil regulatore0
Outcome
many more tillerse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilizer and soil regulator can promote rice growth and development for many more tillers and obvious yield-increasing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer and soil regulator increased yield.

Treatment
organic fertilizer and soil regulatore0
Outcome
yield-increasinge0
Direction
yield-increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilizer and soil regulator can promote rice growth and development for many more tillers and obvious yield-increasing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1299 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.