Paper · 2016 · Plant Production Science

Introduction of a fungal NADP(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhA) improves growth, grain weight and salt resistance by enhancing the nitrogen uptake efficiency in forage rice

Haibo Zhang; Chenggang Liang; Naohiro Aoki; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We report the effect of the introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman) by analyzing the transgenic rice plants in terms of growth, source function, and nitrogen contents. NADP (H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activities in the gdhA-transgenic lines were markedly higher than those in non-transgenic control plants. Plant growth analysis at the seedling stage revealed that the leaf area and shoot and root dry weights of the high gdhA-expressors were higher than those of control plants under both high (high N) and low nitrogen (low N) conditions. These results suggested that the source ability was enhanced by the gdhA introduction. This was supported by the fact that the net photosynthesis rate at the heading stage was also higher in transgenic than in control leaves. Furthermore, under both high and low N conditions, the nitrogen contents in the shoots and roots, at seedling and grain-harvest stages, were significantly higher in high gdhA-expressors than in control plants, indicating that nitrogen uptake was higher in transgenic than in control plants. At the harvest stage, the high gdhA-expressors exhibited greater panicle and spikelet numbers per plant compared with control plants, resulting in higher grain weight, under the high N conditions. In addition, gdhA expression in forage rice significantly enhanced their tolerance to salt stress compared to control plants. The present study showed that the introduction of a fungal gdhA into forage rice could lead to higher source ability, better growth and higher grain weight by enhancing nitrogen uptake efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDH activity was markedly higher in gdhA-transgenic rice lines than in non-transgenic controls.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Material
gdhA-transgenic linese2
Treatment
introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA)e1
Outcome
NADP (H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activitiese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
non-transgenic control plantse2

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“NADP (H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activities in the gdhA-transgenic lines were markedly higher than those in non-transgenic control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the seedling stage, leaf area and shoot and root dry weights of high gdhA-expressors were higher than controls under both high and low N.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Material
high gdhA-expressorse2
Organ / stage
seedling stagee2
Treatment
high (high N) and low nitrogen (low N) conditionse2
Outcome
leaf area and shoot and root dry weightse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
control plantse2

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant growth analysis at the seedling stage revealed that the leaf area and shoot and root dry weights of the high gdhA-expressors were higher than those of control plants under both high (high N) and low nitrogen (low N) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis rate at heading stage was higher in transgenic than in control leaves.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Organ / stage
heading stagee3
Treatment
transgenice3
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
control leavese3

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“the net photosynthesis rate at the heading stage was also higher in transgenic than in control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen contents in shoots and roots at seedling and grain-harvest stages were significantly higher in high gdhA-expressors than in controls under both N levels.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Material
high gdhA-expressorse4
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse4
Treatment
high and low N conditionse4
Outcome
nitrogen contentse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
control plantse4

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“under both high and low N conditions, the nitrogen contents in the shoots and roots, at seedling and grain-harvest stages, were significantly higher in high gdhA-expressors than in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High gdhA-expressors had greater panicle and spikelet numbers per plant than controls at harvest under high N.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Material
high gdhA-expressorse5
Treatment
high N conditionse5
Outcome
panicle and spikelet numbers per plante5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
control plantse5

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“the high gdhA-expressors exhibited greater panicle and spikelet numbers per plant compared with control plants, resulting in higher grain weight, under the high N conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High gdhA-expressors had higher grain weight than controls under high N.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Material
high gdhA-expressorse5
Treatment
high N conditionse5
Outcome
grain weighte5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
control plantse5

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“the high gdhA-expressors exhibited greater panicle and spikelet numbers per plant compared with control plants, resulting in higher grain weight, under the high N conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

gdhA expression significantly enhanced tolerance to salt stress in forage rice compared with controls.

Taxon
forage ricee6
Treatment
gdhA expressione6
Outcome
tolerance to salt stresse6
Direction
enhancede6
Comparator
control plantse6

Verbatim

e6

“gdhA expression in forage rice significantly enhanced their tolerance to salt stress compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that gdhA introduction enhanced source ability in forage rice.

Taxon
forage ricee1
Treatment
gdhA introductione7
Outcome
source abilitye7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“introduction of a fungal glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) into forage rice (cv. Momiroman)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“These results suggested that the source ability was enhanced by the gdhA introduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–690 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.