Paper · 2014 · Annals of Agricultural Research

Agronomic management for sustainable Pearlmillet-wheat cropping system in sandy loam soils

Pawan Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Sunita Yadav; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was undertaken to study the effect of farm yard manure (FYM) and higher seed rate on pearlmillet-wheat cropping system at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India during 2009-10 and 2010-11. Incorporation of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 in pearlmillet resulted in increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake over recommended dose of fertilizer and package in both the crops. Incorporation of FYM @10 t ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet and 30 per cent higher seed rate in both the crops had increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake of pearlmillet and wheat over both recommended fertilizer application alone or with 10 t FYM ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet. Inclusion of cluster bean as inter crop in pearlmillet also gave higher returns over recommended dose of fertilizers and package alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t ha-1 in pearlmillet increased grain yield and net return in both crops relative to the recommended fertilizer package.

Taxon
Pearlmillet-wheatt0
Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yield, net returne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer and packagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 in pearlmillet resulted in increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake over recommended dose of fertilizer and package in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearlmillet-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t ha-1 increased nutrient uptake in both crops.

Taxon
Pearlmillet-wheatt0
Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1e0
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer and packagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 in pearlmillet resulted in increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake over recommended dose of fertilizer and package in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearlmillet-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and a 30 per cent higher seed rate increased grain yield and net returns of pearlmillet and wheat over fertilizer comparison regimes.

Taxon
pearlmillet and wheatCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
FYM @10 t ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet and 30 per cent higher seed ratee0
Outcome
grain yield, net returne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer application alone or with 10 t FYM ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of FYM @10 t ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet and 30 per cent higher seed rate in both the crops had increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake of pearlmillet and wheat over both recommended fertilizer application alone or with 10 t FYM ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and a 30 per cent higher seed rate increased nutrient uptake of pearlmillet and wheat.

Taxon
pearlmillet and wheatCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
FYM @10 t ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet and 30 per cent higher seed ratee0
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer application alone or with 10 t FYM ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of FYM @10 t ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet and 30 per cent higher seed rate in both the crops had increased grain yield, net return and nutrients uptake of pearlmillet and wheat over both recommended fertilizer application alone or with 10 t FYM ha-1 before sowing of pearlmillet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster bean intercropping in pearlmillet gave higher returns than the recommended fertilizer package alone.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
cluster bean as inter crope0
Interactor
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0other
Outcome
returnse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizers and package alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inclusion of cluster bean as inter crop in pearlmillet also gave higher returns over recommended dose of fertilizers and package alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–831 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.