Paper · 2009 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Changes intrans-resveratrol and other phenolic compounds in grape skin and seeds under low temperature storage after post-harvest

X. D Li; B. H Wu; L. J. Wang; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryChanges in the concentrations of trans-resveratrol (Res) and other phenolic compounds in the skin and seeds of red grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’) during low temperature storage (−1º ± 0.5ºC) after post-harvest UV-B and UV-C irradiation and incubation at room temperature (25ºC) were evaluated. No obvious changes in Res levels were observed in control and UV-B-irradiated grape skins after 14 d. A higher content of Res was recorded in UV-B-irradiated grape skins for only 7 d in cold storage, but the content was highest in UV-C-irradiated grape skins for the entire period (28 d) in cold storage. Total levels of anthocyanins in grape skins after either UV treatment were significantly higher than in controls during the first 7 d of storage, while only those in UV-B-treated skins were significantly higher than controls during the later period (from 21 – 28 d) of storage, due to sharp declines in levels of the five main anthocyanins in UV-C-treated grape skins. Total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents remained constant in UV-B- and UV-C-treated grape skins during cold storage and did not differ from controls. Levels of Res in grape seeds remained constant and did not differ between UV treatments, or from controls, over 28 d of low temperature storage. However, the total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents in control and UV-B-treated grape seeds declined from day-2 to day-28 of cold storage, while those of UV-C-treated grape seeds remained constant. Changes in catechin and epicatechin were responsible for the changes observed in total flavan-3-ols and flavonols during cold storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control and UV-B grape skin resveratrol showed no obvious change after 14 days.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Outcome
Res levelse0
Direction
No obvious changese0
Qualifier
after 14 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No obvious changes in Res levels were observed in control and UV-B-irradiated grape skins after 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B irradiated skins had higher resveratrol content for only seven days in cold storage.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Treatment
UV-B-irradiatede0
Outcome
content of Rese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
only 7 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher content of Res was recorded in UV-B-irradiated grape skins for only 7 d in cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C irradiated skins had the highest resveratrol content over 28 days of cold storage.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Treatment
UV-C-irradiatede0
Outcome
contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
entire period (28 d)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content was highest in UV-C-irradiated grape skins for the entire period (28 d) in cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Either UV treatment raised skin anthocyanins over controls in the first seven days.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Treatment
either UV treatmente0
Outcome
Total levels of anthocyaninse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first 7 de0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total levels of anthocyanins in grape skins after either UV treatment were significantly higher than in controls during the first 7 d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only UV-B treated skins had higher anthocyanins than controls from days 21 to 28.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
UV-B-treatede0
Outcome
Total levels of anthocyaninse1
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
from 21 – 28 de0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only those in UV-B-treated skins were significantly higher than controls during the later period (from 21 – 28 d) of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total levels of anthocyanins in grape skins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–666 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five main anthocyanins sharply declined in UV-C treated skins.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Treatment
UV-C-treatede0
Outcome
levels of the five main anthocyaninse0
Direction
sharp declinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sharp declines in levels of the five main anthocyanins in UV-C-treated grape skins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skin flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents stayed constant with UV-B and UV-C and did not differ from controls.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape skinse0
Outcome
Total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contentse0
Direction
remained constante0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents remained constant in UV-B- and UV-C-treated grape skins during cold storage and did not differ from controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed resveratrol stayed constant and did not differ among UV treatments and controls over 28 days.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape seedse0
Outcome
Levels of Rese0
Direction
remained constante0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of Res in grape seeds remained constant and did not differ between UV treatments, or from controls, over 28 d of low temperature storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control seed flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents declined from day 2 to day 28.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape seedse0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contentse0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents in control and UV-B-treated grape seeds declined from day-2 to day-28 of cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1425 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treated seed flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents declined from day 2 to day 28.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
grape seedse0
Treatment
UV-B-treatede0
Outcome
total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contentse0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents in control and UV-B-treated grape seeds declined from day-2 to day-28 of cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1425 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treated seed flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents remained constant.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae2
Organ / stage
grape seedse0
Treatment
UV-C-treatede0
Outcome
total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contentse1
Direction
remained constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those of UV-C-treated grape seeds remained constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1484 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents in control and UV-B-treated grape seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1379 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catechin and epicatechin changes explained changes in total flavan-3-ols and flavonols during storage.

Taxon
grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)Vitis viniferae1
Compound
catechin and epicatechine0
Outcome
total flavan-3-ols and flavonolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in catechin and epicatechin were responsible for the changes observed in total flavan-3-ols and flavonols during cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1619 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera × V. amurensis ‘Beiquan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–169 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.