Paper · 1986 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Stunting in 'Gigas' Wheat as Influenced by Temperature and Daylength

D Atsmon; MG Bush; LT Evans

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C, all plants were severely stunted in long days (LD) but normal in short days (SD). The results of reciprocal transfers between SD and LD indicate that line 492 plants pass through a stage which is very sensitive to LD at 15/ 10°C, between about 14 and 27 days after sowing, just before double ridge formation at the shoot apex. LD during that interval caused stunting in most plants whereas SD at that stage allowed all plants to develop normally. Transfers between temperature regimes of 15/10°C and 24/19°C under LD also indicated that the period just prior to double ridge formation was critical for stunting. In the uniculm line 492 stunting in LD was caused by temperature regimes cooler than 21 /16°C;, whereas in the oligoculm line 380 the main shoots of most plants were normal even at 15/ 10°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 492 plants were severely stunted in long days but normal in short days at 15/10°C.

Material
line 492e1
Treatment
long days (LD)e1
Outcome
severely stuntede1
Comparator
short days (SD)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C, all plants were severely stunted in long days (LD) but normal in short days (SD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long days during the sensitive interval caused stunting in most plants, whereas short days at that stage allowed normal development.

Treatment
LD during that intervale1
Outcome
stunting in most plantse1
Comparator
SD at that stagee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“LD during that interval caused stunting in most plants whereas SD at that stage allowed all plants to develop normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–519 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 492 plants are very sensitive to long days between about 14 and 27 days after sowing, just before double ridge formation.

Material
line 492e1
Organ / stage
between about 14 and 27 days after sowing, just before double ridge formation at the shoot apexe1
Outcome
very sensitive to LDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“line 492 plants pass through a stage which is very sensitive to LD at 15/ 10°C, between about 14 and 27 days after sowing, just before double ridge formation at the shoot apex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The period just before double ridge formation was critical for stunting in wheat.

Outcome
critical for stuntinge1
Qualifier
the period just prior to double ridge formatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Transfers between temperature regimes of 15/10°C and 24/19°C under LD also indicated that the period just prior to double ridge formation was critical for stunting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–684 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In uniculm line 492, stunting in long days was caused by temperature regimes cooler than 21/16°C.

Material
uniculm line 492e1
Treatment
temperature regimes cooler than 21 /16°Ce1
Outcome
stunting in LDe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the uniculm line 492 stunting in LD was caused by temperature regimes cooler than 21 /16°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–779 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In oligoculm line 380, the main shoots of most plants were normal even at 15/10°C.

Material
oligoculm line 380e1
Outcome
the main shoots of most plants were normale1
Qualifier
even at 15/ 10°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the oligoculm line 380 the main shoots of most plants were normal even at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants of the uniculm 'gigas' wheat line 492 were grown at 15/ 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑

light · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.