Paper · 2002 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Environmental effects on stunting and the expression of a tiller inhibition ( tin ) gene in wheat

Brian L. Duggan; Richard A. Richards; Hiroshi Tsuyuzaki

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A recessive gene (tin) that inhibits tillering in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and that may be important in the redirection of assimilate from unproductive to productive tillers, has been reported. However, this gene has also been associated with a fatal condition known as 'stunting'. The severity of this phenomenon has been shown to increase when plants are grown under long photoperiods and at low temperatures. The objectives of this study were to observe how the expression of the tin gene varied in different genetic backgrounds, in addition to obtaining a better understanding of environmental factors that may affect both tillering and stunting in lines with the tin gene. Plants were grown outdoors in Canberra, Australia, at various times throughout the year, as well as under controlled conditions where photoperiod, temperature and light intensity were varied. The inhibition of tillers resulting from the presence of the tin gene was most extreme in summer, autumn and spring (up to 90% reduction in tillering). However, when sown in late autumn and winter, tillering was reduced by between 30-50% for the tin lines compared with their near-isogenic parents. Reduced tillering in the tin lines was due to an earlier cessation of tillering rather than a reduced rate. Stunting was frequently observed in some lines more than others when plants were grown under long days and when temperatures were low. The daily minimum temperature, rather than the average daily temperature, was associated with stunting. The duration of the dark period also influenced stunting, with a longer dark period reducing the incidence of stunting from almost 100% to 0%. In all experiments where irradiance was increased, stunting also increased. In addition, elevated CO2 also increased growth characteristics associated with stunting. It is concluded that stunting is associated with a high assimilate supply to the main stem shoot apex before the time of floral initiation. This is caused by an inhibition of tillering and a high photothermal quotient. Leaf length was found to be a good indicator of stunting severity, with stunted plants producing shorter leaves than those plants which failed to stunt. Measurements of leaf length indicated that stunting is induced when the second leaf is expanding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tin tiller inhibition was strongest in summer, autumn and spring, with up to 90% reduction.

Gene
tine0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 90%e0
Qualifier
summer, autumn and springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition of tillers resulting from the presence of the tin gene was most extreme in summer, autumn and spring (up to 90% reduction in tillering).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late autumn and winter sowing reduced tin-line tillering by 30-50% relative to near-isogenic parents.

Material
tin linese0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30-50%e0
Qualifier
late autumn and wintere0
Comparator
near-isogenic parentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, when sown in late autumn and winter, tillering was reduced by between 30-50% for the tin lines compared with their near-isogenic parents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tin-line tillering resulted from earlier cessation rather than a reduced rate.

Material
tin linese0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Qualifier
earlier cessation of tillering rather than a reduced ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced tillering in the tin lines was due to an earlier cessation of tillering rather than a reduced rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stunting was more frequent in some lines under long days and low temperature.

Outcome
Stuntinge0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
under long days and when temperatures were lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stunting was frequently observed in some lines more than others when plants were grown under long days and when temperatures were low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily minimum rather than average temperature was associated with stunting.

Treatment
daily minimum temperaturee0
Outcome
stuntinge0
Comparator
average daily temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The daily minimum temperature, rather than the average daily temperature, was associated with stunting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer dark periods reduced stunting incidence from almost 100% to 0%.

Treatment
longer dark periode0
Outcome
incidence of stuntinge0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
0%e0
Qualifier
from almost 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the dark period also influenced stunting, with a longer dark period reducing the incidence of stunting from almost 100% to 0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irradiance increased stunting in all experiments.

Treatment
irradiancee0
Outcome
stuntinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all experiments where irradiance was increased, stunting also increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased growth characteristics associated with stunting.

Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
growth characteristics associated with stuntinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, elevated CO2 also increased growth characteristics associated with stunting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1829 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stunting is interpreted as associated with high assimilate supply to the shoot apex before floral initiation due to inhibited tillering and high photothermal quotient.

Outcome
stuntinge0
Qualifier
high assimilate supply to the main stem shoot apex before the time of floral initiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that stunting is associated with a high assimilate supply to the main stem shoot apex before the time of floral initiation. This is caused by an inhibition of tillering and a high photothermal quotient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–2048 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stunted plants produced shorter leaves, making leaf length a good severity indicator.

Outcome
Leaf lengthe0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
good indicator of stunting severitye0
Comparator
plants which failed to stunte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf length was found to be a good indicator of stunting severity, with stunted plants producing shorter leaves than those plants which failed to stunt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf measurements indicated induction of stunting during second leaf expansion.

Organ / stage
second leafe0
Outcome
stunting is inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Measurements of leaf length indicated that stunting is induced when the second leaf is expanding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

co2 · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.