Paper · 2010 · HortScience

Responses of Creeping Bentgrass to Trinexapac-ethyl and Biostimulants under Summer Stress

Yan Xu; Bingru Huang

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summer decline in turf quality and growth of cool-season grass species is a major concern in turfgrass management. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether foliar application of trinexapac-ethyl (TE) and two biostimulants (TurfVigor and CPR) containing seaweed extracts would alleviate the decline in creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.) growth during summer months and to examine effects of TE and the biostimulants on leaf senescence and root growth. The study was performed on a ‘Penncross’ putting green built on a sandy loam soil at Hort Farm II, North Brunswick, NJ, in 2007 and 2008. Turf was foliar-sprayed with water (control), TE (0.05 kg a.i./ha), TurfVigor (47.75 L·ha −1 ), or CPR (19.10 L·ha −1 ) from late June to early September in a 2-week interval in both years. Turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, canopy photosynthetic rate (P n ), and root growth exhibited significant decline during July and August in both 2007 and 2008, to a greater extent in each parameter for the control treatment. Foliar application of TE resulted in significant improvement in turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, and P n on certain sampling dates from July to September in both years compared with the control. Both TurfVigor and CPR significantly improved visual quality during July and August in both years by promoting both shoot and root growth. This study suggests that proper application of TE and selected biostimulants could be effective to improve summer performance of creeping bentgrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, canopy photosynthetic rate, and root growth declined during July and August in both years, more in control turf.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Outcome
Turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, canopy photosynthetic rate (P n ), and root growthe0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
during July and August in both 2007 and 2008e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, canopy photosynthetic rate (P n ), and root growth exhibited significant decline during July and August in both 2007 and 2008, to a greater extent in each parameter for the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TE improved turf quality and density on some July to September dates relative to water control.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of TEe0
Outcome
turf quality, densitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
on certain sampling dates from July to September in both yearse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of TE resulted in significant improvement in turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, and P n on certain sampling dates from July to September in both years compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TE improved chlorophyll content and canopy photosynthetic rate on some July to September dates relative to control.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of TEe0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, and P ne0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of TE resulted in significant improvement in turf quality, density, chlorophyll content, and P n on certain sampling dates from July to September in both years compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TurfVigor improved visual quality in July and August of both years by promoting shoot and root growth.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
TurfVigore0
Outcome
visual qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
during July and August in both years by promoting both shoot and root growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TurfVigor and CPR significantly improved visual quality during July and August in both years by promoting both shoot and root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CPR improved visual quality in July and August of both years by promoting shoot and root growth.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CPRe0
Outcome
visual qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
during July and August in both years by promoting both shoot and root growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TurfVigor and CPR significantly improved visual quality during July and August in both years by promoting both shoot and root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest applying TE and selected biostimulants to improve creeping bentgrass summer performance.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae0
Outcome
proper application of TE and selected biostimulantse0
Qualifier
could be effective to improve summer performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proper application of TE and selected biostimulants could be effective to improve summer performance of creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1534 · show in text ↑

trinexapac-ethyl · physiology: photosynthesis · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trinexapac-ethyl · quality: general · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: general · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.