Paper · 2024 · Crop Science

Foliar application of diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA‐6) alleviated summer bentgrass decline and heat damage to creeping bentgrass

Zhou Li; Min Zhou; Hongyin Qi; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera ) is sensitive to supra‐optimal temperature, which makes summer bentgrass decline (SBD) a main conundrum troubling turf manager. Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA‐6) is an artificial and bioactive plant growth regulator affecting tolerance to various abiotic stresses. It is commercially available for field application due to multiple advantages such as low cost, environmentally friendly compound, and sustainable effect. However, the positive effect and mechanism of DA‐6‐mediated heat tolerance in cool‐season grass species and SBD are not yet been explored. Objectives of the study were to screen the optimal dose of DA‐6 for improvement in thermotolerance and to investigate roles of DA‐6 in regulating photosynthesis, osmotic balance, and antioxidant homeostasis in two creeping bentgrass cultivars (heat‐tolerant 13 M and heat‐sensitive Seaside II) in controlled heat condition. Summer heat tolerance induced by the DA‐6 was further evaluated for 2 years under field conditions in a subtropical zone. Results demonstrated that the optimal dose of DA‐6 was screened as 0.1 mM based on analyses of chlorophyll content, photochemical efficiency, and cell membrane stability under heat stress. Foliar application of DA‐6 significantly alleviated heat‐induced leaf senescence by improving photosynthetic performance, accumulation of sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) for osmotic homeostasis, and total antioxidant capacity for reactive oxygen species scavenging in the two cultivars. A 2‐year field test was further carried out to demonstrate that turf quality of the two cultivars was significantly improved after being treated by foliar DA‐6 during hot summer months in 2020 and 2021. Current findings suggested that DA‐6‐mediated thermo‐resistant mechanism was associated with photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant in cool‐season grass species. Foliar application of DA‐6 could be a cheap, effective, and environmentally friendly strategy to alleviate SBD.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal DA-6 dose for heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass was 0.1 mM.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
DA‐6e1
Outcome
optimal dosee1
Value
0.1 mMe1
Qualifier
under heat stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“the optimal dose of DA‐6 was screened as 0.1 mM based on analyses of chlorophyll content, photochemical efficiency, and cell membrane stability under heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DA-6 significantly alleviated heat-induced leaf senescence in creeping bentgrass.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of DA‐6e2
Outcome
leaf senescencee2
Direction
alleviatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of DA‐6 significantly alleviated heat‐induced leaf senescence by improving photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DA-6 improved photosynthetic performance of creeping bentgrass under heat.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of DA‐6e2
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee2
Direction
improvinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of DA‐6 significantly alleviated heat‐induced leaf senescence by improving photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DA-6 increased sugar accumulation for osmotic homeostasis in creeping bentgrass under heat.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of DA‐6e2
Outcome
accumulation of sugarse3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of DA‐6 significantly alleviated heat‐induced leaf senescence by improving photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1368 · show in text ↑
e3

“accumulation of sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) for osmotic homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DA-6 increased total antioxidant capacity for reactive oxygen species scavenging in both creeping bentgrass cultivars under heat.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Foliar application of DA‐6e2
Outcome
total antioxidant capacitye4
Direction
increaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of DA‐6 significantly alleviated heat‐induced leaf senescence by improving photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1368 · show in text ↑
e4

“total antioxidant capacity for reactive oxygen species scavenging in the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DA-6 significantly improved turf quality of both creeping bentgrass cultivars in hot summer months of 2020 and 2021 in field conditions.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
foliar DA‐6e5
Outcome
turf qualitye5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
in 2020 and 2021e5
Setting
field conditions in a subtropical zonee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“heat damage to creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e5

“turf quality of the two cultivars was significantly improved after being treated by foliar DA‐6 during hot summer months in 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1744 · show in text ↑
e6

“under field conditions in a subtropical zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1057 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.