Paper · 2004 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Improving productivity of four fruit species by growth regulators applied once in ultra-low doses to the collar

Maria Grochowska; Malgorzata Hodun; Augustyn Mika

20
claims
22
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryTwo growth retardants: paclobutrazol (P, Cultar) or 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) were applied once alone, or in mixtures (in a range of 5 to 20 mg per tree) to the collar of maiden plum, sour and sweet cherries and apple trees, in early spring of the second year after planting. Plum and apple trees were also treated with benzyladenine (BA) at 10 mg per tree a.i. in a mixture with P or TIBA. Sweet and sour cherry trees were treated with natural phenolic substances: phloridzin (Phi) and quercetin (Que) alone, or in mixtures with P and TIBA. A mid-stem treatment with P and shoot bending were also applied to the plum and apple trees for comparison. Measurements of tree growth and fruiting were made within 4 or 5 years. The reaction of the four species to the treatments varied according to the growth regulator applied. Plum trees responded mostly to TIBA and its mixtures with P. A strong suppression of tree growth and increased fruit productivity, as well as improved fruit quality, were observed. The TIBA application and its mixtures with P were also effective in causing growth reduction of the sweet cherry trees. Treatments with P alone, or mixed with TIBA, were effective in growth limitation of sour cherry trees. Some increase in the reproductive processes was observed only after the TIBA treatment in both species. The apple trees responded to application of mixtures of TIBA with benzyladenine (BA), or with P, and to P alone, with effective growth reduction. But only the P + BA treatment increased significantly the fruiting of apple trees, while the other treatments resulted in crops proportional to the diminished tree sizes. The mid-stem treatment did not affect plum trees but increased growth of apple trees. Shoot bending had no effect on the plum trees but increased fruiting of apple trees. The addition of Phi to half the lower P dose or TIBA, magnified growth suppression in the sweet and sour cherry trees. When applied alone Que caused a small growth inhibition but Phi produced some increase in growth of sour cherry trees. Results obtained show the possibilities of practical applications of growth regulators to the collar. Their reduced doses mixed with natural phenolic substances are equally effective in growth suppression and make fruit production safer and more profitable, especially in plum and sour cherry trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA and its mixtures with P suppressed plum tree growth.

Taxon
Plum treesPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
TIBA and its mixtures with Pe0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plum trees responded mostly to TIBA and its mixtures with P. A strong suppression of tree growth and increased fruit productivity, as well as improved fruit quality, were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA and its mixtures with P increased plum fruit productivity.

Taxon
Plum treesPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
TIBA and its mixtures with Pe0
Outcome
fruit productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plum trees responded mostly to TIBA and its mixtures with P. A strong suppression of tree growth and increased fruit productivity, as well as improved fruit quality, were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA and its mixtures with P improved plum fruit quality.

Taxon
Plum treesPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
TIBA and its mixtures with Pe0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plum trees responded mostly to TIBA and its mixtures with P. A strong suppression of tree growth and increased fruit productivity, as well as improved fruit quality, were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA and its mixtures with P reduced sweet cherry growth.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviume0
Treatment
TIBA application and its mixtures with Pe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TIBA application and its mixtures with P were also effective in causing growth reduction of the sweet cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P alone or mixed with TIBA limited sour cherry growth.

Taxon
sour cherry treesPrunus cerasuse0
Treatment
P alone, or mixed with TIBAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
limitatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasus
Prunus cerasus · TaxonDag Endresen · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with P alone, or mixed with TIBA, were effective in growth limitation of sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only TIBA increased reproductive processes in sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
TIBA treatmente0
Outcome
reproductive processese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some increase in the reproductive processes was observed only after the TIBA treatment in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth reduction of the sweet cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only TIBA increased reproductive processes in sour cherry.

Taxon
sour cherry treesPrunus cerasust0
Treatment
TIBA treatmente0
Outcome
reproductive processese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasus
Prunus cerasus · TaxonDag Endresen · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some increase in the reproductive processes was observed only after the TIBA treatment in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth limitation of sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA plus BA, TIBA plus P, and P alone reduced apple growth.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
mixtures of TIBA with benzyladenine (BA), or with P, and to P alonee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apple trees responded to application of mixtures of TIBA with benzyladenine (BA), or with P, and to P alone, with effective growth reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P plus BA significantly increased apple fruiting.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
P + BA treatmente0
Outcome
fruitinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only the P + BA treatment increased significantly the fruiting of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other apple treatments produced crops proportional to smaller tree sizes.

Outcome
crops proportional to the diminished tree sizese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the other treatments resulted in crops proportional to the diminished tree sizes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-stem treatment did not affect plum trees.

Taxon
plum treesPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
mid-stem treatmente0
Outcome
plum treese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mid-stem treatment did not affect plum trees but increased growth of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-stem treatment increased apple growth.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
mid-stem treatmente0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mid-stem treatment did not affect plum trees but increased growth of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot bending had no effect on plum trees.

Taxon
plum treesPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
Shoot bendinge0
Outcome
plum treese0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot bending had no effect on the plum trees but increased fruiting of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot bending increased apple fruiting.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Shoot bendinge0
Outcome
fruitinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot bending had no effect on the plum trees but increased fruiting of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Phi to lower P dose or TIBA magnified sweet cherry growth suppression.

Taxon
sweete0
Treatment
addition of Phi to half the lower P dose or TIBAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of Phi to half the lower P dose or TIBA, magnified growth suppression in the sweet and sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Phi to lower P dose or TIBA magnified sour cherry growth suppression.

Taxon
sour cherry treesPrunus cerasuse0
Treatment
addition of Phi to half the lower P dose or TIBAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasus
Prunus cerasus · TaxonDag Endresen · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of Phi to half the lower P dose or TIBA, magnified growth suppression in the sweet and sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Que alone slightly inhibited sour cherry growth.

Taxon
sour cherry treesPrunus cerasuse0
Treatment
Quee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
smalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasus
Prunus cerasus · TaxonDag Endresen · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied alone Que caused a small growth inhibition but Phi produced some increase in growth of sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phi alone increased sour cherry growth.

Taxon
sour cherry treesPrunus cerasuse0
Treatment
Phie0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasus
Prunus cerasus · TaxonDag Endresen · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied alone Que caused a small growth inhibition but Phi produced some increase in growth of sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced growth regulator doses mixed with natural phenolic substances were equally effective in growth suppression.

Treatment
reduced doses mixed with natural phenolic substancese0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their reduced doses mixed with natural phenolic substances are equally effective in growth suppression and make fruit production safer and more profitable, especially in plum and sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2369 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded reduced regulator doses with phenolics make fruit production safer and more profitable.

Outcome
fruit production safer and more profitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their reduced doses mixed with natural phenolic substances are equally effective in growth suppression and make fruit production safer and more profitable, especially in plum and sour cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2369 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

N-benzyladenine · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.