Paper · 1993 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Cultivar Difference in the Response of Root System to Nitrogen Application in Rice Plant.

Saneaki TANAKA; Akira YAMAUCHI; Yasuhiro KONO

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine whether the root system development in rice plant under different nitrogen (N) application regimes is related to adaptability for heavy manuring (AHM) of the cultivar. Four rice cultivars that differ in AHM were grown in plastic pots (25 cm in diameter, 30 cm in depth), under three N levels, which were equivalent to 5 kg-N/1000 m2 (5 N plot), 10 kg-N/1000m2 (10 N plot) and 30 kg-N/1000 m2 (30 N plot). The plants were harvested 33 days after sowing and at heading stage. In the 33-day-old plants, growth of root system was inhibited with increasing N application, apart from the production of the nodal roots, which was promoted. Although the root responses differed with the cultivars, the differences were not related to those of AHM. On the other hand, in the heading-stage plants, the total number and length of nodal root axes per plant increased. But again, notable differences among the cultivars were not recognized. In contrast, different responses to N application according to AHM of the cultivars was found in lateral root development. The cultivars with AHM showed a substantial increase in total lateral root length per plant at 30 N plot as compared with those in 5 N and 10 N plots, whereas the lateral root growth of the cultivars with high AHM remained relatively unchanged under the different N levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 33-day-old rice, increasing nitrogen inhibited root system growth.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
33-day-old plantse0
Treatment
increasing N applicatione0
Outcome
growth of root systeme0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 33-day-old plants, growth of root system was inhibited with increasing N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen promoted nodal root production in 33-day-old rice.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
33-day-old plantse0
Treatment
increasing N applicatione0
Outcome
production of the nodal rootse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 33-day-old plants, growth of root system was inhibited with increasing N application, apart from the production of the nodal roots, which was promoted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root responses in 33-day-old plants differed among cultivars but were unrelated to adaptability for heavy manuring.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
root responsese0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the root responses differed with the cultivars, the differences were not related to those of AHM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At heading, the total number of nodal root axes per plant increased.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
heading-stage plantse0
Outcome
total numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the heading-stage plants, the total number and length of nodal root axes per plant increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At heading, the total length of nodal root axes per plant increased.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
heading-stage plantse0
Outcome
length of nodal root axes per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the heading-stage plants, the total number and length of nodal root axes per plant increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Notable cultivar differences in heading-stage nodal root axes were not recognized.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
notable differences among the cultivars were not recognizede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But again, notable differences among the cultivars were not recognized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral root development responded differently to nitrogen according to cultivar adaptability for heavy manuring.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
lateral root developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different responses to N application according to AHM of the cultivars was found in lateral root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars with AHM had substantially longer total lateral roots at 30 N than at 5 N and 10 N.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material
cultivars with AHMe0
Treatment
30 N plote0
Outcome
total lateral root length per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
5 N and 10 N plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars with AHM showed a substantial increase in total lateral root length per plant at 30 N plot as compared with those in 5 N and 10 N plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral root growth of high-AHM cultivars remained relatively unchanged across nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material
cultivars with high AHMe0
Treatment
different N levelse0
Outcome
lateral root growthe0
Direction
remained relatively unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lateral root growth of the cultivars with high AHM remained relatively unchanged under the different N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.