Paper · 1982 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Fruit Russeting in Apple as Affected by Various Gibberellins

S.J. Wertheim

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
74
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effects of GA3, GA4, GA7, and GA4+7 on apple fruit russeting were studied on the cvs Karmijn de Sonnaville and Golden Delicious. Four sprays of 10 ppm a.i. applied at 10-day intervals from the end of flowering were compared. Fruit russeting was reduced by all gibberellins in Karmijn and by all but one (GA3) in Golden Delicious. GA4 appeared slightly more effective than GA7, and in Karmijn GA7 was better than GA3. Differences between GA4 and GA4+7 were small. Fruit number per tree was generally not affected by the treatments, and only in one trial was a slight thinning effect observed. Fruit growth was slightly stimulated by some treatments, and flower-bud formation was affected negatively by the gibberellin treatments in two of the four trials. Results pertaining to fruit russeting, fruit bearing, fruit growth and flower-bud formation are briefly discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All gibberellins reduced fruit russeting in Karmijn.

Material
Karmijne0
Treatment
all gibberellinse0
Outcome
Fruit russetinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit russeting was reduced by all gibberellins in Karmijn and by all but one (GA3) in Golden Delicious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All gibberellins except GA3 reduced fruit russeting in Golden Delicious.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
all but one (GA3)e0
Outcome
Fruit russetinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit russeting was reduced by all gibberellins in Karmijn and by all but one (GA3) in Golden Delicious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4 appeared slightly more effective than GA7 against russeting.

Treatment
GA4e0
Outcome
slightly more effectivee0
Direction
slightly more effectivee0
Comparator
GA7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA4 appeared slightly more effective than GA7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Karmijn, GA7 was better than GA3 against russeting.

Material
Karmijne0
Treatment
GA7e0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
GA3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“in Karmijn GA7 was better than GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in russeting control between GA4 and GA4+7 were small.

Treatment
GA4e0
Outcome
Differencese0
Direction
smalle0
Comparator
GA4+7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences between GA4 and GA4+7 were small.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number per tree was generally unaffected by the treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit number per treee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit number per tree was generally not affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One trial observed a slight thinning effect.

Outcome
thinning effecte0
Direction
slighte0
Qualifier
one triale0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“only in one trial was a slight thinning effect observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some treatments slightly stimulated fruit growth.

Treatment
some treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit growthe0
Direction
slightly stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit growth was slightly stimulated by some treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin treatments negatively affected flower-bud formation in two of four trials.

Treatment
gibberellin treatmentse0
Outcome
flower-bud formatione0
Direction
affected negativelye0
Qualifier
two of the four trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“flower-bud formation was affected negatively by the gibberellin treatments in two of the four trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–764 · show in text ↑

class · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.