Paper · 2024 · Bulletin of KSAU

THE EFFECT OF NON-ROOT TREATMENTS ON THE APPLE FRUITS RIPENING RATE CONTROL

Tat'yana Prichko; Tat'yana Leonidovna Smelik; Kristina Vadimovna Prichko

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The purpose of research is to study the actions of growth regulators based on 1-methylcyclopropene (Harvista) to give an attractive appearance, improve the taste of apple fruits and control the maturation rate. The results of the use of non-root treatments with a growth regulator based on 1-methylcyclopropene (Harvista) on the fruits of the Red Delicious apple variety grown in the Krasnodar Region, which allow controlling the intensity of ethylene release and increasing the period of fruit maturation, helping to extend the harvest time, are presented. Processing fruits was carried out by Harvista once 10 days before the removal of fruits. A decrease in the concentration of ethylene in fruits contributed to less shedding of apples and, accordingly, an increase in yield. The extension of the harvest period contributed to an increase in the weight of the fruits of the Red Delicious variety up to 337.5 g (by 8–10 %). A decrease in fruit shedding when using Harvista and an increase in the weight of apples contributed to an average of up to 15.3 kg/tree, or 54.7 t/ha, in the control – 11.8 kg/tree, or 42.2 t/ha . The use of this preparation made it possible to stimulate the development of the integumentary color of the fruit, and by the beginning of the harvest, the apples had a more attractive presentation due to an increase in the content of anthocyanins in the skin of the fruit. The study of the effect of non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista) showed an increase in the resistance of fruits to damage when exposed to a stressor, as well as a positive effect on the qualitative composition of fruits (pulp hardness, dry matter content, vitamins, minerals), which made it possible to increase the shelf life of apples. The result of using this growth regulator is better fruit quality and higher yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A decrease in ethylene concentration in apple fruits contributed to less shedding of apples.

Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
less sheddinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in the concentration of ethylene in fruits contributed to less shedding of apples and, accordingly, an increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased period of fruit maturation from the Harvista non-root treatment, which extended the harvest period.

Material
Red Deliciouse0
Treatment
non-root treatments with a growth regulator based on 1-methylcyclopropene (Harvista)e0
Outcome
period of fruit maturatione0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
Krasnodar Regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-root treatments with a growth regulator based on 1-methylcyclopropene (Harvista) on the fruits of the Red Delicious apple variety grown in the Krasnodar Region, which allow controlling the intensity of ethylene release and increasing the period of fruit maturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extension of the harvest period increased the weight of Red Delicious fruits up to 337.5 g (by 8-10 %).

Material
Red Deliciouse0
Treatment
extension of the harvest periode0
Outcome
weight of the fruitse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
337.5 ge0
Qualifier
by 8–10 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extension of the harvest period contributed to an increase in the weight of the fruits of the Red Delicious variety up to 337.5 g (by 8–10 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With Harvista, yield averaged up to 15.3 kg/tree, or 54.7 t/ha, versus 11.8 kg/tree, or 42.2 t/ha in the control.

Treatment
Harvistae0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
15.3 kg/tree, or 54.7 t/hae0
Qualifier
11.8 kg/tree, or 42.2 t/hae2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when using Harvista and an increase in the weight of apples contributed to an average of up to 15.3 kg/tree, or 54.7 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–778 · show in text ↑
e2

“11.8 kg/tree, or 42.2 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1122 · show in text ↑
e3

“the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation stimulated the development of the integumentary colour of the fruit.

Treatment
this preparatione0
Outcome
development of the integumentary color of the fruite0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of this preparation made it possible to stimulate the development of the integumentary color of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation increased anthocyanin content in the fruit skin, giving a more attractive presentation by harvest.

Organ / stage
skin of the fruite0
Treatment
this preparatione0
Outcome
content of anthocyaninse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of this preparation made it possible to stimulate the development of the integumentary color of the fruit, and by the beginning of the harvest, the apples had a more attractive presentation due to an increase in the content of anthocyanins in the skin of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-root treatment with Harvista increased the resistance of fruits to damage when exposed to a stressor.

Treatment
non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)e0
Outcome
resistance of fruits to damagee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in the resistance of fruits to damage when exposed to a stressor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1564 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-root treatment with Harvista had a positive effect on the qualitative composition of fruits (pulp hardness, dry matter content, vitamins, minerals).

Treatment
non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)e0
Outcome
qualitative composition of fruitse1
Direction
positive effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive effect on the qualitative composition of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-root treatment with Harvista increased the shelf life of apples.

Treatment
non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)e0
Outcome
shelf lifee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-root treatments with a growth regulator (Harvista)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“which made it possible to increase the shelf life of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1752 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

class · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

class · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

class · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.