Paper · 2010 · Guizhou nongye kexue

Effect of fermented bio-organic fertilizer on growth and fruit quality of organic tomato.

H. Shao; Huang Ya-dong

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The bio-organic fertilizer made from lees and chicken dung was used in soilless cultivation of tomato.The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation could obviously improve tomato growth,increase VC content and sugar/acid ratio,reduce nitrate content in tomato fruits,effectively decrease occurrence of bacterial wilt and go on the market early,and the tomato yield was up to 5018.3kg/667m2,18.6% higher than CK.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bio-organic fertilizer improved tomato growth

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“could obviously improve tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bio-organic fertilizer increased VC content and sugar/acid ratio of tomato

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
VC content and sugar/acid ratioe1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increase VC content and sugar/acid ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bio-organic fertilizer reduced nitrate content in tomato fruits

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
nitrate contente1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“reduce nitrate content in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–406 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bio-organic fertilizer decreased the occurrence of bacterial wilt in tomato

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
occurrence of bacterial wilte1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effectively decrease occurrence of bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–456 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under the bio-organic fertilizer was up to 5018.3kg/667m2

Outcome
yielde1
Value
5018.3kg/667m2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the tomato yield was up to 5018.3kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under the bio-organic fertilizer was 18.6% higher than the CK

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
18.6%e1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the tomato yield was up to 5018.3kg/667m2,18.6% higher than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–550 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bio-organic fertilizer let tomato go on the market early

Treatment
bio-organic fertilizere2
Outcome
go on the markete1
Direction
earlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“go on the market early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the bio-organic fertilizer made from 85% lees,10% dry chicken dung 3% slag,1% soybean meal,1% urea and 1% complex microbes with 60% moisture for 20d fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–287 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–325 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.