Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Water Use and Grain Yield in Drought‐Tolerant Corn in the Texas High Plains

B. Hao; Q. Xue; T. H. Marek; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought is an important factor limiting corn ( Zea mays L.) yields in the Texas High Plains, and adoption of drought‐tolerant (DT) hybrids could be a management tool under water shortage. We conducted a 3‐yr field study to investigate yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) in DT hybrids. One conventional (33D49) and 4 DT hybrids (P1151HR, P1324HR, P1498HR, and P1564HR) were grown at three water regimes (I 100 , I 75 , and I 50 , referring to 100, 75, and 50% ET requirement) and three planting densities (PD) (5.9, 7.4, and 8.4 plants m −2 ). Yield (13.56 Mg ha −1 ) and ET (719 mm) were the greatest at I 100 but WUE (2.1 kg m −3 ) was the greatest at I 75 . Although DT hybrids did not always have greater yield and WUE than 33D49 at I 100 , hybrids P1151HR and P1564HR consistently had greater yield and WUE than 33D49 at I 75 and I 50 . Compared to 33D49, P1151HR and P1564HR had 8.6 to 12.1% and 19.1% greater yield at I 75 and I 50 , respectively. Correspondingly, WUE was 9.8 to 11.7% and 20.0% greater at I 75 and I 50 , respectively. Greater PD resulted in greater yield and WUE at I 100 and I 75 but PD did not affect yield and WUE at I 50 . Yield and WUE in greater PD (8.4 plants m −2 ) were 6.3 to 8.3% greater than those in smaller PD (5.9 plants m −2 ). The results of this study demonstrated that proper selection of DT hybrids can increase corn yield and WUE under water‐limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was greatest at I 100, at 13.56 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
I 100e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
13.56 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield (13.56 Mg ha −1 ) and ET (719 mm) were the greatest at I 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ET was greatest at I 100, at 719 mm.

Treatment
I 100e0
Outcome
ETe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
719 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield (13.56 Mg ha −1 ) and ET (719 mm) were the greatest at I 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE was greatest at I 75, at 2.1 kg m −3.

Treatment
I 75e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
2.1 kg m −3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE (2.1 kg m −3 ) was the greatest at I 75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1151HR and P1564HR had greater yield at I 75 and I 50 than 33D49.

Material
P1151HR and P1564HRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
I 75 and I 50e0
Comparator
33D49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrids P1151HR and P1564HR consistently had greater yield and WUE than 33D49 at I 75 and I 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1151HR and P1564HR had greater WUE at I 75 and I 50 than 33D49.

Material
P1151HR and P1564HRe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
I 75 and I 50e0
Comparator
33D49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrids P1151HR and P1564HR consistently had greater yield and WUE than 33D49 at I 75 and I 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1151HR and P1564HR had 8.6 to 12.1% greater yield at I 75.

Material
P1151HR and P1564HRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
8.6 to 12.1%e0
Qualifier
I 75e0
Comparator
33D49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 33D49, P1151HR and P1564HR had 8.6 to 12.1% and 19.1% greater yield at I 75 and I 50 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1151HR and P1564HR had 19.1% greater yield at I 50.

Material
P1151HR and P1564HRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19.1%e0
Qualifier
I 50e0
Comparator
33D49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 33D49, P1151HR and P1564HR had 8.6 to 12.1% and 19.1% greater yield at I 75 and I 50 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE was 9.8 to 11.7% greater at I 75.

Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.8 to 11.7%e0
Qualifier
I 75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE was 9.8 to 11.7% and 20.0% greater at I 75 and I 50 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE was 20.0% greater at I 50.

Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
20.0%e0
Qualifier
I 50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE was 9.8 to 11.7% and 20.0% greater at I 75 and I 50 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density increased yield and WUE at I 100 and I 75.

Treatment
Greater PDe0
Outcome
yield and WUEe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater PD resulted in greater yield and WUE at I 100 and I 75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density did not affect yield and WUE at I 50.

Treatment
PDe0
Outcome
yield and WUEe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PD did not affect yield and WUE at I 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8.4 versus 5.9 plants m −2, yield and WUE were 6.3 to 8.3% greater.

Treatment
8.4 plants m −2e0
Outcome
Yield and WUEe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
6.3 to 8.3%e0
Comparator
5.9 plants m −2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and WUE in greater PD (8.4 plants m −2 ) were 6.3 to 8.3% greater than those in smaller PD (5.9 plants m −2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.