Paper · 2008

Study on Callus Induction and Plantlet Regeneration in Different Genotypes Maize

Liu Qian

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The immature embryo of five maize lines (Zea mays.L) was used to study the influencing of genotypes, 2,4-D concentration and embryo-age on callus induction, influencing of 6-BA on callus differentiation ,and influencing of IBA on buds rooting. The results showed that, callis were obtained from Q31×Z31,Q31×Z3,B73,Z3 except Q31.In addition, there were dominant differences among the induction percentage of four genotypes on the same conditions.The concentration of 2,4-D in mediums and embryo-age had evident effects on the callus induction percentage of immature embryo. Adding 2.0mg/L 2,4-D in N6 medium and the embryo-age with 11d to 13d were optimal for improving the percentage of inducing callus. The 6-BA promoted callus differentiation and IBA promoted the buds rooting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four maize genotypes produced callus, whereas Q31 did not.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Material
Q31×Z31,Q31×Z3,B73,Z3e0
Outcome
callis were obtainede0
Comparator
Q31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“callis were obtained from Q31×Z31,Q31×Z3,B73,Z3 except Q31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction percentages differed among the four genotypes under the same conditions.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Material
four genotypese0
Outcome
induction percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were dominant differences among the induction percentage of four genotypes on the same conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–444 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D concentration affected immature embryo callus induction percentage.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Organ / stage
immature embryoe0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
callus induction percentagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of 2,4-D in mediums and embryo-age had evident effects on the callus induction percentage of immature embryo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–571 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo age affected immature embryo callus induction percentage.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Organ / stage
embryo-agee0
Outcome
callus induction percentagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“embryo-age had evident effects on the callus induction percentage of immature embryo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–571 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N6 medium with 2.0mg/L 2,4-D was optimal for raising callus induction percentage.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Treatment
2.0mg/L 2,4-D in N6 mediume0
Outcome
percentage of inducing calluse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding 2.0mg/L 2,4-D in N6 medium and the embryo-age with 11d to 13d were optimal for improving the percentage of inducing callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo age of 11d to 13d was optimal for raising callus induction percentage.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Organ / stage
embryo-agee0
Outcome
percentage of inducing calluse0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
11d to 13de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the embryo-age with 11d to 13d were optimal for improving the percentage of inducing callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6-BA promoted callus differentiation.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Treatment
6-BAe0
Outcome
callus differentiatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 6-BA promoted callus differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA promoted bud rooting.

Taxon
Zea mays.LZea mayse1
Treatment
IBAe0
Outcome
buds rootinge0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IBA promoted the buds rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“five maize lines (Zea mays.L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.