Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elongated maize microshoots rooted on MS medium with 1.97 μM indole-3-butyric acid.

A claim from Efficient in vitro direct shoot organogenesis from seedling derived split node explants of maize (Zea mays L.) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elongated maize microshoots rooted on MS medium with 1.97 μM indole-3-butyric acid.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
MS medium fortified with 1.97 μM indole-3-butyric acide1
Outcome
micro shoots were rootede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surface sterilized maize seeds were germinated on MS medium lacking plant growth regulators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–109
e1

“The elongated micro shoots were rooted on MS medium fortified with 1.97 μM indole-3-butyric acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–864

Title

Efficient in vitro direct shoot organogenesis from seedling derived split node explants of maize (Zea mays L.)

Ramesh Mushke; Rajesh Yarra; Mallesham Bulle Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.03.001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f4129861641dac24017611780e6ada52f065e9ee2d7b5029de89c3cc301ac4a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.