Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fusarium infestation lowered emergence, shoot length, root length and seedling dry weight.

A claim from Laboratory and Growth Chamber Evaluation of Fungicidal Seed Treatments for Maize Seedling Blight Caused by Fusarium Species · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium infestation lowered emergence, shoot length, root length and seedling dry weight.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Fusarium-infested potting mediume0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
emergence, shoot length, root length, and dry weight of seedlingse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
noninfested controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium-infested potting medium, which resulted in lower emergence, shoot length, root length, and dry weight of seedlings compared to the noninfested control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1570
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80

Title

Laboratory and Growth Chamber Evaluation of Fungicidal Seed Treatments for Maize Seedling Blight Caused by Fusarium Species

G. P. Munkvold; J. K. O'Mara Plant Disease 2002. doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.2.143

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-4476ae99e4ece52d286ead965b0269c6399169d91a38d0db36f7faa36aa85411 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Fusarium · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.