Paper · 1936 · Botanical Gazette

Limited Growth and Abnormalities in Excised Corn Root Tips

William J. Robbins; Virginia B. White

19
claims
36
verbatim quotes
46
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Excised corn root tips grown in a liquid medium (solution C) composed of calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, ferric chloride, and dextrose showed limited growth and sometimes became abnormal. Similar results were secured in a modified Pfeffer's solution containing dextrose. 2. The amount of growth in solution C varied with the brand of dextrose used, even when the dextrose was of high purity. 3. The substitution of levulose, cane sugar, xylose, or maltose for dextrose in solution C was of no benefit; in fact, the growth with xylose and maltose was very poor. 4. Growth was improved by the addition to solution C of Difco agar, water extracts of agar, qualitative filter paper, water extracts of qualitative filter paper, soluble starch, autolyzed or dried brewers' yeast, or a mixture of salts of manganese, boron, and zinc. 5. The best results were secured by the add tion of qualitative filter paper in the proportion of one half sheet, 9 cm. in diameter, to 30 cc. of medium. 6. Exposure of excised root tips originally 1 cm. long for 24 or 48 hours on the surface of a semi-solid agar medium or on moist qualitative filter paper markedly favored their later growth in solution C. 7. Exposure of excised root tips in a moist atmosphere or washing them in redistilled water before cultivation in solution C was not beneficial. 8. Recutting excised roots after pretreatment on filter paper did not affect their later growth in solution C. 9. Increased aeration of the root tips in the liquid medium increased the growth and delayed the occurrence of abnormalities. The results were not so favorable as those secured by the addition of agar or of filter paper to the medium. 10. Reducing the acidity of the solution, increasing its salt concentration, substituting ferric tartrate or ferric citrate for ferric chloride, adding quantitative filter paper, absorbent cotton, copper sulphate, thallium nitrate, glutathione, or vitamin B to the medium were not beneficial. 11. The addition of pantothenic acid was in some cases beneficial. 12. Pfeffer's solution, Uspenski's solution, and the solution used by White for the cultivation of excised tomato roots were no more effective than solution C. 13. The maximum growth of individual excised corn root tips 1 mm. long was 61.2 cm., or 0.9 cm. per 24 hours; of root tips 2 mm. long was 85.0 cm., or 1.4 cm. per 24 hours; of root tips 10 mm. long was 98.2 cm., or 2.4 cm. per 24 hours. 14. It is thought that the poor growth in solution C and similar solutions is the result of a deficiency in the solution, a part of which at least is inorganic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excised corn root tips in solution C showed limited growth and occasional abnormalities.

Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
limited growth and sometimes became abnormale0
Setting
liquid mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Excised corn root tips grown in a liquid medium (solution C) composed of calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, ferric chloride, and dextrose showed limited growth and sometimes became abnormal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified Pfeffer solution produced similar limited growth and abnormalities.

Organ / stage
Root Tipst0
Outcome
Similar resultse0
Setting
modified Pfeffer's solution containing dextrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similar results were secured in a modified Pfeffer's solution containing dextrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–309 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in solution C varied with dextrose brand.

Treatment
brand of dextrosee0
Outcome
growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of growth in solution C varied with the brand of dextrose used, even when the dextrose was of high purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting levulose or cane sugar for dextrose did not improve growth.

Treatment
levulose, cane sugare0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
no benefite0
Comparator
dextrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The substitution of levulose, cane sugar, xylose, or maltose for dextrose in solution C was of no benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth with xylose was very poor.

Treatment
xylosee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
very poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth with xylose and maltose was very poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth with maltose was very poor.

Treatment
maltosee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
very poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth with xylose and maltose was very poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar, filter paper, starch, yeast, or manganese, boron and zinc salts improved growth.

Treatment
Difco agar, water extracts of agar, qualitative filter paper, water extracts of qualitative filter paper, soluble starch, autolyzed or dried brewers' yeast, or a mixture of salts of manganese, boron, and zince0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
solution Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth was improved by the addition to solution C of Difco agar, water extracts of agar, qualitative filter paper, water extracts of qualitative filter paper, soluble starch, autolyzed or dried brewers' yeast, or a mixture of salts of manganese, boron, and zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Qualitative filter paper at one half sheet per 30 cc gave the best growth results.

Treatment
qualitative filter papere0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0
Value
one half sheet, 9 cm. in diameter, to 30 cc. of mediume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best results were secured by the add tion of qualitative filter paper in the proportion of one half sheet, 9 cm. in diameter, to 30 cc. of medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment on agar or moist filter paper favored later growth in solution C.

Treatment
semi-solid agar medium or on moist qualitative filter papere0
Outcome
later growthe0
Direction
markedly favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exposure of excised root tips originally 1 cm. long for 24 or 48 hours on the surface of a semi-solid agar medium or on moist qualitative filter paper markedly favored their later growth in solution C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist-atmosphere exposure or washing in redistilled water did not benefit later growth.

Treatment
moist atmosphere or washing them in redistilled watere0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
not beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exposure of excised root tips in a moist atmosphere or washing them in redistilled water before cultivation in solution C was not beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recutting roots after filter-paper pretreatment did not change subsequent growth.

Treatment
Recutting excised rootse0
Outcome
later growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Recutting excised roots after pretreatment on filter paper did not affect their later growth in solution C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More aeration increased growth and delayed abnormalities, though less than agar or filter paper.

Treatment
Increased aeratione0
Outcome
growth and delayed the occurrence of abnormalitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
addition of agar or of filter papere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased aeration of the root tips in the liquid medium increased the growth and delayed the occurrence of abnormalities. The results were not so favorable as those secured by the addition of agar or of filter paper to the medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing acidity, salt and iron sources, or adding several tested supplements was not beneficial.

Treatment
Reducing the acidity of the solution, increasing its salt concentration, substituting ferric tartrate or ferric citrate for ferric chloride, adding quantitative filter paper, absorbent cotton, copper sulphate, thallium nitrate, glutathione, or vitamin Be0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
not beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reducing the acidity of the solution, increasing its salt concentration, substituting ferric tartrate or ferric citrate for ferric chloride, adding quantitative filter paper, absorbent cotton, copper sulphate, thallium nitrate, glutathione, or vitamin B to the medium were not beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–2008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pantothenic acid sometimes benefited growth.

Treatment
pantothenic acide0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
in some casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of pantothenic acid was in some cases beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other named culture solutions were no more effective than solution C.

Treatment
Pfeffer's solution, Uspenski's solution, and the solution used by White for the cultivation of excised tomato rootse0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
no more effectivee0
Comparator
solution Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pfeffer's solution, Uspenski's solution, and the solution used by White for the cultivation of excised tomato roots were no more effective than solution C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-millimeter root tips reached 61.2 cm maximum growth, 0.9 cm per day.

Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
maximum growthe0
Value
61.2 cm.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth of individual excised corn root tips 1 mm. long was 61.2 cm., or 0.9 cm. per 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2345 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-millimeter root tips reached 85.0 cm maximum growth, 1.4 cm per day.

Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
root tips 2 mm. longe0
Value
85.0 cm.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“root tips 2 mm. long was 85.0 cm., or 1.4 cm. per 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2350–2408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-millimeter root tips reached 98.2 cm maximum growth, 2.4 cm per day.

Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
root tips 10 mm. longe0
Value
98.2 cm.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“root tips 10 mm. long was 98.2 cm., or 2.4 cm. per 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2413–2472 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poor growth in solution C was attributed partly to inorganic deficiency.

Outcome
poor growthe0
Qualifier
a deficiency in the solution, a part of which at least is inorganice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Root Tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“the poor growth in solution C and similar solutions is the result of a deficiency in the solution, a part of which at least is inorganic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2497–2633 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

224 papers: 183 positive, 41 negative or no effect

182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

220 papers more in this group

See all 224 papers →

maltose · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

agar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

manganese atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 40 positive, 33 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.