Paper · 2013 · Food Science

Comparison of Effectiveness between Chitosan Oligosaccharide and PVP in Preserving Juicy Peaches during Refrigerated Storage

Chen Yi-zha

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of coating with chitosan oligosaccharide(COS) and polyvinylpyrrolidone(PVP) coating as well as combination on the quality of Xinbaihua peach(Prunus persica) stored at(3 ± 1) ℃ were explored.When used separately,0.1 g/100 mL PVP and 2 g/100 mL COS were very useful to inhibit the increases in respiration intensity and relative conductivity and retard the decreases in firmness and total soluble solid(TSS) content.Furthermore we evaluated the effectiveness of the combined use of 0.1 g/100 mL PVP and 2 g/100 mL COS to preserve refrigerated peaches.Coating with 2 g/100 mL COS led to a significantly higher TSS level after 25 days of storage than the control(P 0.05),effectively postponed the decomposition of sugars,and potently inhibited the generation of MDA and PPO,and 0.1 g/100 mL PVP had a similar effect on fruit respiration but exhibited weaker effects on other indicators in comparison to 2 g/100 mL COS.Treatment with 2 g/100 mL COS and 0.1 g/100 mL PVP exerted a more significant inhibitory effect on fruit respiration(P 0.05) than the control and markedly slowed down the upward trend of relative conductivity and MDA content,demonstrating the protective effect of this combined treatment on the cell wall and membrane of peach fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVP coating inhibited rises in respiration and conductivity and retarded declines in firmness and soluble solids.

Treatment
0.1 g/100 mL PVPe0
Outcome
respiration intensity and relative conductivitye0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When used separately,0.1 g/100 mL PVP and 2 g/100 mL COS were very useful to inhibit the increases in respiration intensity and relative conductivity and retard the decreases in firmness and total soluble solid(TSS) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COS coating inhibited rises in respiration and conductivity and retarded declines in firmness and soluble solids.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COSe0
Outcome
firmness and total soluble solid(TSS) contente0
Direction
retarde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When used separately,0.1 g/100 mL PVP and 2 g/100 mL COS were very useful to inhibit the increases in respiration intensity and relative conductivity and retard the decreases in firmness and total soluble solid(TSS) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

COS coating gave significantly higher soluble solids after 25 days than control.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COSe0
Outcome
TSS levele0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after 25 days of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coating with 2 g/100 mL COS led to a significantly higher TSS level after 25 days of storage than the control(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COS postponed sugar decomposition.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COSe0
Outcome
decomposition of sugarse0
Direction
postponede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coating with 2 g/100 mL COS led to a significantly higher TSS level after 25 days of storage than the control(P 0.05),effectively postponed the decomposition of sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COS inhibited MDA and PPO generation.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COSe1
Outcome
generation of MDA and PPOe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potently inhibited the generation of MDA and PPO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“Coating with 2 g/100 mL COS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVP had a similar effect to COS on fruit respiration.

Treatment
0.1 g/100 mL PVPe0
Outcome
fruit respiratione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
2 g/100 mL COSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.1 g/100 mL PVP had a similar effect on fruit respiration but exhibited weaker effects on other indicators in comparison to 2 g/100 mL COS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVP had weaker effects on other indicators than COS.

Treatment
0.1 g/100 mL PVPe0
Outcome
other indicatorse0
Direction
weakere0
Comparator
2 g/100 mL COSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.1 g/100 mL PVP had a similar effect on fruit respiration but exhibited weaker effects on other indicators in comparison to 2 g/100 mL COS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined COS and PVP more strongly inhibited respiration than control.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COS and 0.1 g/100 mL PVPe0
Outcome
fruit respiratione0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 2 g/100 mL COS and 0.1 g/100 mL PVP exerted a more significant inhibitory effect on fruit respiration(P 0.05) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined COS and PVP slowed increases in relative conductivity and MDA content.

Treatment
2 g/100 mL COS and 0.1 g/100 mL PVPe0
Outcome
relative conductivity and MDA contente0
Direction
slowed downe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 2 g/100 mL COS and 0.1 g/100 mL PVP exerted a more significant inhibitory effect on fruit respiration(P 0.05) than the control and markedly slowed down the upward trend of relative conductivity and MDA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: respiration · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.