Paper · 2013 · Guizhou nongye kexue

Effects of Chitosan Treatment on Preservation of Lvhua 9 Peaches Stored at Low Temperature

Sun Rui-guo

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lvhua 9peaches were used to explore the effects of 1%chitosan and 2%chitosan treatments on the quality of peaches stored at(0±1)℃and relative humidity 80%~95%.Physicochemical indexes of various treatments were compared.The results showed that compared with CK,chitosan coating treatment could significantly reduce the decline of browning index,inhibit the respiration rate and weight loss rate,delay the decrease of fruit firmness and Vc content(P0.05),but the effect on the soluble solids content was not significant(P 0.05).Among them,treatment of 2% chitosan showed significantly higher inhibitory effect than the former,30dof storage,the browning index was 24.77%,weightlessness rate and respiratory rate were 4.17% and 7.43mg(CO2)/(g.h),soluble solids content and Vc content were 11.67%and 2.34mg/g respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating significantly reduced decline in peach browning index versus CK.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
chitosan coating treatmente0
Outcome
browning indexe0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with CK,chitosan coating treatment could significantly reduce the decline of browning index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating inhibited peach respiration and weight loss rates versus CK.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
chitosan coating treatmente0
Outcome
respiration rate and weight loss ratee0
Direction
inhibite0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with CK,chitosan coating treatment could significantly reduce the decline of browning index,inhibit the respiration rate and weight loss rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating delayed decreases in peach firmness and Vc content versus CK.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
chitosan coating treatmente0
Outcome
fruit firmness and Vc contente0
Direction
delay the decreasee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with CK,chitosan coating treatment could significantly reduce the decline of browning index,inhibit the respiration rate and weight loss rate,delay the decrease of fruit firmness and Vc content(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating did not significantly affect peach soluble solids content.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Chitosan Treatmentt0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chitosan Treatment on Preservation of Lvhua 9 Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“effect on the soluble solids content was not significant(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% chitosan treatment inhibited quality decline more than 1% treatment.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
2% chitosane0
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the formere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment of 2% chitosan showed significantly higher inhibitory effect than the former”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 days with 2% chitosan, peach browning index was 24.77%.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
browning indexe0
Value
24.77%e0
Qualifier
30dof storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“30dof storage,the browning index was 24.77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 days with 2% chitosan, peach weight loss rate was 4.17%.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
weightlessness ratee0
Value
4.17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“weightlessness rate and respiratory rate were 4.17% and 7.43mg(CO2)/(g.h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 days with 2% chitosan, peach respiratory rate was 7.43mg(CO2)/(g.h).

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
respiratory ratee0
Value
7.43mg(CO2)/(g.h)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“weightlessness rate and respiratory rate were 4.17% and 7.43mg(CO2)/(g.h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 days with 2% chitosan, peach soluble solids content was 11.67%.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Value
11.67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“soluble solids content and Vc content were 11.67%and 2.34mg/g respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–816 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 days with 2% chitosan, peach Vc content was 2.34mg/g.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
Vc contente0
Value
2.34mg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“soluble solids content and Vc content were 11.67%and 2.34mg/g respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–816 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chitosan · physiology: respiration · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

storage · physiology: respiration · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.