Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer

Effect of Zn application methods on wheat grain yield and Zn utilization in Zn-deficient soils of dryland

LI Meng-hu

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil Zn deficiency and drought are serious stress factors limiting the Zn nutrition of crops in northwest China. Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau. Results show that Zn application does not increase the grain yield of winter wheat,but can increase the grain Zn contents. The increases are varied with the Zn application methods,the grain Zn contents are increased by about 40%,up to 40 mg / kg for foliar application and soil + foliar application,not significant with soil application,although the soil DTPA- Zn is triply increased.Zinc use efficiency of the foliar applied Zn is higher than those of the soil and soil + foliar applied Zn. Each one kg / ha foliar applied Zn is observed to be able to increase the grain Zn content by 6. 70-13. 04 mg / kg. The grain Zn utilization and total Zn utilization efficiency are respectively 6. 02%-9. 40% and 19. 78%-30. 91% for the foliar applied Zn,which are correspondingly 80 and 132- 221 times more than those for the soil applied Zn. Nitrogenrates have no effect on the yield and Zn utilization. Therefore,the foliar application of Zn is more cost-effective and environmental friendly than the soil application,and is one of the important practices to improve grain Zn concentration on Zn- deficient soils in dryland areas of northwestern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application did not increase the grain yield of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Zn applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
does not increasee1
Setting
middle part of Loess Plateaue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn application does not increase the grain yield of winter wheat,but can increase the grain Zn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and soil plus foliar Zn application increased grain Zn content by about 40%, up to 40 mg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar application and soil + foliar applicatione2
Outcome
grain Zn contentse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
about 40%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“the grain Zn contents are increased by about 40%,up to 40 mg / kg for foliar application and soil + foliar application,not significant with soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Zn did not significantly change grain Zn content of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
soil applicatione2
Outcome
grain Zn contentse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“the grain Zn contents are increased by about 40%,up to 40 mg / kg for foliar application and soil + foliar application,not significant with soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1 kg/ha of foliar applied Zn increased grain Zn content by 6.70-13.04 mg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
one kg / ha foliar applied Zne3
Outcome
grain Zn contente3
Direction
increasee3
Value
6. 70-13. 04 mg / kge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e3

“Each one kg / ha foliar applied Zn is observed to be able to increase the grain Zn content by 6. 70-13. 04 mg / kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1011 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn utilization of foliar applied Zn was 6.02%-9.40%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar applied Zne4
Outcome
grain Zn utilizatione4
Value
6. 02%-9. 40%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain Zn utilization and total Zn utilization efficiency are respectively 6. 02%-9. 40% and 19. 78%-30. 91% for the foliar applied Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Zn utilization efficiency of foliar applied Zn was 19.78%-30.91%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar applied Zne4
Outcome
total Zn utilization efficiencye4
Value
19. 78%-30. 91%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain Zn utilization and total Zn utilization efficiency are respectively 6. 02%-9. 40% and 19. 78%-30. 91% for the foliar applied Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc use efficiency of foliar applied Zn was higher than that of soil and soil plus foliar applied Zn.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar applied Zne6
Outcome
Zinc use efficiencye6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
soil and soil + foliar applied Zne6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e6

“Zinc use efficiency of the foliar applied Zn is higher than those of the soil and soil + foliar applied Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and total Zn utilization of foliar applied Zn were 80 and 132-221 times those of soil applied Zn.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar applied Zne4
Outcome
grain Zn utilization and total Zn utilization efficiencye4
Direction
times moree5
Value
80 and 132- 221 timese5
Comparator
soil applied Zne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain Zn utilization and total Zn utilization efficiency are respectively 6. 02%-9. 40% and 19. 78%-30. 91% for the foliar applied Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1150 · show in text ↑
e5

“which are correspondingly 80 and 132- 221 times more than those for the soil applied Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates had no effect on yield and Zn utilization of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Nitrogenratese7
Outcome
yield and Zn utilizatione7
Direction
no effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogenrates have no effect on the yield and Zn utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1300 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar Zn application over soil application as more cost-effective and environmentally friendly for raising grain Zn concentration of wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
the foliar application of Zne1
Comparator
soil applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of soil application,foliar application and soil + foliar application of Zn on yield,Zn contents and accumulation in grain,and Zn use efficiency of winter wheat grown under two N rates at two locations in the middle part of Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–403 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore,the foliar application of Zn is more cost-effective and environmental friendly than the soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1416 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.