Paper · 2005

Effects of 1-MCP on Fruit Firmness, Respiration and Ethylene Production Induced by Exogenous Ethylene in Nectarine Fruit

Junning Wang; Gong De-qiang; Xiaolin Ren

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Qinguang” nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP (an inhibitor of ethylene) on fruit firmness, (respiration), ethylene production and activity of ACC oxidase induced by exogenous ethylene during fruit ripening. The results showed that 1-MCP could restrain the loss of fruit firmness, the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene. It postponed the appearing time of respiration and ethylene production, degraded the height of ethylene peak, but increased the height of respiration peak induced by exogenous ethylene. 1-MCP didn’t inhibit the increase of the activity of ACC oxidase induced by exogenous ethylene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP restrained the loss of nectarine fruit firmness relative to exogenous ethylene.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
loss of fruit firmnesse2
Direction
restraine2
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that 1-MCP could restrain the loss of fruit firmness, the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP restrained the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
respiration rates and ethylene production ratese2
Direction
restraine2
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that 1-MCP could restrain the loss of fruit firmness, the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP postponed the appearing time of respiration and ethylene production in nectarine fruit exposed to exogenous ethylene.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
appearing time of respiration and ethylene productione3
Direction
postponede3
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that 1-MCP could restrain the loss of fruit firmness, the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“It postponed the appearing time of respiration and ethylene production, degraded the height of ethylene peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP degraded the height of the ethylene peak in nectarine fruit exposed to exogenous ethylene.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
height of ethylene peake3
Direction
degradede3
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that 1-MCP could restrain the loss of fruit firmness, the increase of respiration rates and ethylene production rates induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“It postponed the appearing time of respiration and ethylene production, degraded the height of ethylene peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased the height of the respiration peak induced by exogenous ethylene in nectarine fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
height of respiration peake4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“but increased the height of respiration peak induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not inhibit the increase of ACC oxidase activity induced by exogenous ethylene in nectarine fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
activity of ACC oxidasee5
Direction
didn’t inhibite5
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
e5

“1-MCP didn’t inhibit the increase of the activity of ACC oxidase induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–675 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.