Intervention effectmodel-written summary

1-MCP did not inhibit the increase of ACC oxidase activity induced by exogenous ethylene in nectarine fruit.

A claim from Effects of 1-MCP on Fruit Firmness, Respiration and Ethylene Production Induced by Exogenous Ethylene in Nectarine Fruit · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not inhibit the increase of ACC oxidase activity induced by exogenous ethylene in nectarine fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
activity of ACC oxidasee5
Direction
didn’t inhibite5
Comparator
exogenous ethylenee5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nectarine was used to investigate the effects of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–64
e5

“1-MCP didn’t inhibit the increase of the activity of ACC oxidase induced by exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–675

Title

Effects of 1-MCP on Fruit Firmness, Respiration and Ethylene Production Induced by Exogenous Ethylene in Nectarine Fruit

Junning Wang; Gong De-qiang; Xiaolin Ren 2005

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-cb1694bdf16aa4dbd9339074d1a1daa2e53f4658a1da6ce2f987ac57ebac7874 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    1-MCP maintained glucose, fructose and sucrose at higher levels.

    Postharvest application of 1-MCP and ethylene influences fruit softening and quality of ‘Arctic Pride’ nectarine at ambient conditions · 2016 · compared with ethylene or untreated fruit

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
    1-MCP retained wax crystals in peach fruit at 36 days.

    1‐MCP treatment improves the postharvest quality of Jinxiu yellow peach by regulating cuticular wax composition and gene expression during cold storage · 2024

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Treatment with 1-MCP helped maintain high levels of chlorogenic acid, L epicatechin and catechin in peach.

    Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on the aroma volatiles, polyphenols contents, and antioxidant activity of post-harvest ripening peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit · 2020

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Compared with the other three treatments, 1-MCP plus nanomaterial packaging better delayed and inhibited decreases in ester and aldehyde contents.

    Understanding the volatile organic compounds of 1‐methylcyclopropylene fumigation and packaging on yellow‐fleshed peach via headspace‐gas chromatography‐ion mobility spectrometry and chemometric analyses · 2022 · compared with other three treatments

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    1-MCP restrained soluble quinone accumulation.

    1-Methylcyclopropene Delays Browning and Maintains Aroma in Fresh-Cut Nectarines · 2025

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    The 1-MCP treatment gave a higher soluble solid and Vc content in peach fruit.

    Effect of the ethylene on the peach fruit quality and relative physiological mechanism during the MA storage and shelf life · 2009

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    1-MCP maintained peel and flesh ascorbate content and ASC/dehydroascorbate ratio.

    Effect of 1-MCP on Cold Storage Quality and Redox State of Postharvest Peach Fruits · 2013

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    1-MCP treatment suppressed the increase of soluble solid content in peach fruits.

    Effect of 1-MCP and Prestorage on Respiration,Ethylene Production and Quality of Peach · 2013

    No difference from an alternative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.