Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted to determine the effect of N,P,K and Zn application on the first cutting yield and nutrient quality of Zea mexicana.The results of this study showed that nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers significantly increased the first cutting fresh yield and hay(leaf + stem sheath) yield of Z.mexicana by 7.00%～39.08% and 6.02%～37.94%.The increase in yield of Z.mexicana caused by nitrogen fertilizer was greater than that caused by phosphate and potassium fertilizer.The nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers also significantly increased crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber and crude ash's content.The crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber's content of leaves were greater than that of stem and sheath.The positive effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizer on Z.mexicana quality was greater than that of phosphate and potassium fertilizer on Z.mexicana quality.This study also indicated that zinc fertilizers contributed to improve the yield and nutritional quality of Z.mexicana.This study suggested that nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers fertilization could increase the yield of Z.mexicana and improve nutritional quality of Z.mexicana.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
N, P, K and Zn fertilizers significantly raised fresh first-cut yield by 7.00%–39.08%.
- Taxon
- Z.mexicana
Zea mays subsp. mexicanae0 - Treatment
- nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- first cutting fresh yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.00%～39.08%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers significantly increased the first cutting fresh yield and hay(leaf + stem sheath) yield of Z.mexicana by 7.00%～39.08% and 6.02%～37.94%”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P, K and Zn fertilizers significantly raised first-cut hay yield by 6.02%–37.94%.
- Taxon
- Z.mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- hay(leaf + stem sheath) yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.02%～37.94%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers significantly increased the first cutting fresh yield and hay(leaf + stem sheath) yield of Z.mexicana by 7.00%～39.08% and 6.02%～37.94%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer raised Zea mexicana yield more than phosphate and potassium fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Z.mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- phosphate and potassium fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in yield of Z.mexicana caused by nitrogen fertilizer was greater than that caused by phosphate and potassium fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P, K and Zn fertilizers significantly raised crude protein, crude fat and crude fiber content.
- Taxon
- Zea mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanat0
- Treatment
- nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- crude protein,crude fat,crude fibere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers also significantly increased crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber and crude ash's content”
t0“Zea mexicana”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P, K and Zn fertilizers significantly raised crude ash content.
- Taxon
- Zea mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanat0
- Treatment
- nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- crude ash's contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium and zinc fertilizers also significantly increased crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber and crude ash's content”
t0“Zea mexicana”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf crude protein, fat and fiber content exceeded stem and sheath content.
- Taxon
- Zea mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Outcome
- crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber's contente0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- stem and sheathe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber's content of leaves were greater than that of stem and sheath”
t0“Zea mexicana”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer improved Zea mexicana quality more than phosphate and potassium fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Z.mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- phosphate and potassium fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The positive effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizer on Z.mexicana quality was greater than that of phosphate and potassium fertilizer on Z.mexicana quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilizer improved Zea mexicana yield and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- Z.mexicanaZea mays subsp. mexicanae0
- Treatment
- zinc fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yield and nutritional qualitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“zinc fertilizers contributed to improve the yield and nutritional quality of Z.mexicana”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →zinc atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →phosphorus · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
102 papers more in this group
See all 106 papers →8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.