Paper · 2013 · Anhui nongye kexue

Yield Effect of Formula and Zinc Fertilizer on Winter Wheat Planted in the Soil with Different Zinc Content

Liu Kui-shen

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]The study aimed to investigate the yield-increasing effect of formula and zinc fertilizer on winter wheat planted in the soil with different zinc content.[Method]It was carried out on the field with different gradient zinc soil in Pingxiang County.[Result]Zinc fertilizer had the most obvious effect on increasing winter wheat yield by 10.8%,when the content of available zinc in tilth soil was 0.68 mg / kg.Compared with the yield of formula fertilizer treatment,the yield of formula fertilizer and Zn treatment had no obvious change in the tilth soil,which kept the content of available zinc 1.34 mg / kg and 1.57 mg / kg,respectively.Zinc fertilizer had the most obvious effect on decreasing winter wheat yield,when the content of available zinc in tilth soil was 2.26 mg / kg,and the amount was 390 kg / hm2.In contrast to the convention and formula fertilization treatment,the treatment of formula fertilizer and Zn(15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O) increased the content of available zinc in tilth soil significantly.There was no significant difference to be found between conventional and formula fertilization treatment.[Conclusion] Based on the yield responses and the content of available zinc in tilth,zinc fertilizer should be applied to the soil,in which the content of available zinc in tilth was lower than 1.0 mg / kg.11.3-15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O was preferred every other year.It wasn't necessary to apply zinc fertilizer,when the content of available zinc in tilth was higher than 1.0 mg / kg.Compared with conventional fertilization,formula fertilization had good economical and ecological efficiency that should be popularized vigorously.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilizer increased winter wheat yield by 10.8% at 0.68 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Zinc fertilizere0
Outcome
winter wheat yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
10.8%e0
Qualifier
0.68 mg / kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilizer had the most obvious effect on increasing winter wheat yield by 10.8%,when the content of available zinc in tilth soil was 0.68 mg / kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zinc to formula fertilizer did not noticeably change yield at 1.34 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizer and Zn treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no obvious changee0
Qualifier
1.34 mg / kge0
Comparator
formula fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the yield of formula fertilizer treatment,the yield of formula fertilizer and Zn treatment had no obvious change in the tilth soil,which kept the content of available zinc 1.34 mg / kg and 1.57 mg / kg,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zinc to formula fertilizer did not noticeably change yield at 1.57 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizer and Zn treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no obvious changee0
Qualifier
1.57 mg / kge0
Comparator
formula fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the yield of formula fertilizer treatment,the yield of formula fertilizer and Zn treatment had no obvious change in the tilth soil,which kept the content of available zinc 1.34 mg / kg and 1.57 mg / kg,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilizer decreased wheat yield most at 2.26 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Zinc fertilizere0
Outcome
winter wheat yielde0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
2.26 mg / kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilizer had the most obvious effect on decreasing winter wheat yield,when the content of available zinc in tilth soil was 2.26 mg / kg,and the amount was 390 kg / hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizer plus zinc significantly increased available soil zinc over conventional and formula fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizer and Zn(15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
content of available zinc in tilth soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
convention and formula fertilization treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast to the convention and formula fertilization treatment,the treatment of formula fertilizer and Zn(15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O) increased the content of available zinc in tilth soil significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and formula fertilization did not differ significantly.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference to be found between conventional and formula fertilization treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zinc fertilizer below 1.0 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
zinc fertilizer should be appliede0
Qualifier
lower than 1.0 mg / kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc fertilizer should be applied to the soil,in which the content of available zinc in tilth was lower than 1.0 mg / kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors prefer 11.3-15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O every other year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
11.3-15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 Oe0
Outcome
preferred every other yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11.3-15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O was preferred every other year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against zinc fertilizer above 1.0 mg / kg available soil zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
wasn't necessary to apply zinc fertilizere0
Qualifier
higher than 1.0 mg / kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It wasn't necessary to apply zinc fertilizer,when the content of available zinc in tilth was higher than 1.0 mg / kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilization had favorable economic and ecological efficiency versus conventional fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizatione0
Outcome
economical and ecological efficiencye0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with conventional fertilization,formula fertilization had good economical and ecological efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wider use of formula fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizatione0
Outcome
should be popularized vigorouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“formula fertilization had good economical and ecological efficiency that should be popularized vigorously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.