Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Formula fertilizer plus zinc significantly increased available soil zinc over conventional and formula fertilization.

A claim from Yield Effect of Formula and Zinc Fertilizer on Winter Wheat Planted in the Soil with Different Zinc Content · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizer plus zinc significantly increased available soil zinc over conventional and formula fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formula fertilizer and Zn(15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
content of available zinc in tilth soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
convention and formula fertilization treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast to the convention and formula fertilization treatment,the treatment of formula fertilizer and Zn(15 kg / hm2ZnSO 4 ·7H 2 O) increased the content of available zinc in tilth soil significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1026
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59

Title

Yield Effect of Formula and Zinc Fertilizer on Winter Wheat Planted in the Soil with Different Zinc Content

Liu Kui-shen Anhui nongye kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a17d3c9b7efc2ebd497c841d8400c2b8ea7be58d5f4c0ac623752cb54464289c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.