Paper · 2011 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Effect of Internal Ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on Ripening of Fuji Apple

Dapeng Chen

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six hours after hypoxic hypobaria(HH,10 kPa,1.5 kPaO2),Fuji apples were then treated with 1-MCP for 24 h at 20 ℃.Effect of internal ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on ripening physiology of apple during postharvest storage was investigated by examining physiological indexes of apples during storage.The results showed that hypoxic hypobaria treatment significantly decreased internal ethylene concentration(IEC) by 61.6%.However,there were not marked difference in other physiological indexes between the treatment and control.1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content,delayed respiration and ethylene peak,and stimulated activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD),and catalase(CAT).Subsequently,postharvest ripening of apples was effectively delayed.It can be concluded that internal ethylene levels in postharvest apples play a significant role in affecting 1-MCP action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxic hypobaria significantly reduced apple internal ethylene concentration by 61.6%.

Treatment
hypoxic hypobaria treatmente0
Outcome
internal ethylene concentration(IEC)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
61.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hypoxic hypobaria treatment significantly decreased internal ethylene concentration(IEC) by 61.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other physiological indexes did not differ markedly between hypoxic hypobaria and control.

Treatment
hypoxic hypobariae1
Outcome
other physiological indexese0
Direction
not marked differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were not marked difference in other physiological indexes between the treatment and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“hypoxic hypobaria treatment significantly decreased internal ethylene concentration(IEC) by 61.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP prevented loss of fruit firmness and peel chlorophyll content.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll contente0
Direction
prevented the decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH plus 1-MCP prevented loss of fruit firmness and peel chlorophyll content.

Treatment
HH+1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll contente0
Direction
prevented the decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP maintained higher titratable acid content.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
titratable acid contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH plus 1-MCP maintained higher titratable acid content.

Treatment
HH+1-MCPe0
Outcome
titratable acid contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP delayed respiration and ethylene peaks.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiration and ethylene peake0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content,delayed respiration and ethylene peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH plus 1-MCP delayed respiration and ethylene peaks.

Treatment
HH+1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiration and ethylene peake0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content,delayed respiration and ethylene peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP stimulated SOD, POD and CAT activities.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD),and catalase(CAT)e0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP and HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content,delayed respiration and ethylene peak,and stimulated activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD),and catalase(CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH plus 1-MCP stimulated SOD, POD and CAT activities.

Treatment
HH+1-MCPe0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD),and catalase(CAT)e0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HH+1-MCP treatment prevented the decrease of fruits firmness and peel chlorophyll content,maintained higher titratable acid content,delayed respiration and ethylene peak,and stimulated activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD),and catalase(CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest apple ripening was delayed after the treatments.

Outcome
postharvest ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest ripening of apples was effectively delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–866 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude internal ethylene levels affect 1-MCP action.

Compound
internal ethylenee0
Outcome
1-MCP actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“internal ethylene levels in postharvest apples play a significant role in affecting 1-MCP action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–988 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.