Paper · 2014

Effects of Different Temperatures and Exogenous Ethylene Treatment on Ripening of Soft Pear

Jia Xiao-hu

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials, packaging with the 0.015 mm thick PE bags, in order to investigate the effects of different temperatures(20 ℃ and 26 ℃), exogenous ethylene treatment(the concentration was 100 μL·L-1and sealed for 24 h storage at 20 ℃) on ethylene production, respiratory intensity and ripening quality. The results show that, the moderate low temperature could enhance the ethylene production, reduce respiration intensity, and increase the drop speed of fruits hardness. The ripening of three kinds of soft pear fruit was uniform and the diseased fruit rate and weight loss rate were low when the storage temperature was 20 ℃. The best edible period of Red clapp's was storage for 6~8 d, Abate for 9~12 d, Jingbai for 12~15 d, auxiliary by 100 μL·L-1 concentration of ethylene treatment could accelerate the ripening of soft peer fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate low temperature enhanced ethylene production of pear fruit compared with 26 ℃.

Treatment
moderate low temperaturee1
Outcome
ethylene productione1
Direction
enhancee1
Comparator
26 ℃e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“the moderate low temperature could enhance the ethylene production, reduce respiration intensity, and increase the drop speed of fruits hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–541 · show in text ↑
e5

“different temperatures(20 ℃ and 26 ℃)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate low temperature reduced respiration intensity of pear fruit compared with 26 ℃.

Treatment
moderate low temperaturee1
Outcome
respiration intensitye1
Direction
reducee1
Comparator
26 ℃e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“the moderate low temperature could enhance the ethylene production, reduce respiration intensity, and increase the drop speed of fruits hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–541 · show in text ↑
e5

“different temperatures(20 ℃ and 26 ℃)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate low temperature increased the drop speed of fruit hardness in pear.

Treatment
moderate low temperaturee1
Outcome
drop speed of fruits hardnesse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
26 ℃e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“the moderate low temperature could enhance the ethylene production, reduce respiration intensity, and increase the drop speed of fruits hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–541 · show in text ↑
e5

“different temperatures(20 ℃ and 26 ℃)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 20 ℃ gave low diseased fruit rate and weight loss rate in soft pear.

Treatment
storage temperature was 20 ℃e2
Outcome
diseased fruit rate and weight loss ratee2
Direction
lowe2
Comparator
26 ℃e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The ripening of three kinds of soft pear fruit was uniform and the diseased fruit rate and weight loss rate were low when the storage temperature was 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–697 · show in text ↑
e5

“different temperatures(20 ℃ and 26 ℃)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ripening of the three soft pear kinds was uniform at 20 ℃ storage.

Outcome
ripeninge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The ripening of three kinds of soft pear fruit was uniform and the diseased fruit rate and weight loss rate were low when the storage temperature was 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–697 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Best edible period of Red clapp's pear was 6~8 days of storage.

Material
Red clapp'se3
Outcome
best edible periode3
Value
6~8 de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best edible period of Red clapp's was storage for 6~8 d, Abate for 9~12 d, Jingbai for 12~15 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Best edible period of Abate pear was 9~12 days of storage.

Material
Abatee3
Outcome
best edible periode3
Value
9~12 de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best edible period of Red clapp's was storage for 6~8 d, Abate for 9~12 d, Jingbai for 12~15 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Best edible period of Jingbai pear was 12~15 days of storage.

Material
Jingbaie3
Outcome
best edible periode3
Value
12~15 de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best edible period of Red clapp's was storage for 6~8 d, Abate for 9~12 d, Jingbai for 12~15 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene treatment at 100 μL·L-1 accelerated the ripening of soft pear fruit.

Treatment
100 μL·L-1 concentration of ethylene treatmente4
Outcome
ripeninge4
Direction
acceleratee4
Value
100 μL·L-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we chose Red clapp's, Abate and Jingbai pear as experimental materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“auxiliary by 100 μL·L-1 concentration of ethylene treatment could accelerate the ripening of soft peer fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–907 · show in text ↑

ethene · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cold · physiology: hormones · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.