Paper · 2003 · Acta Tritical Crops

Effect of Different Sulphur Application on Yield and Quality of Two Spike Type Winter Wheat Cultivars

Ying Xie

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effects of sulphur application on the population physiolgy, yield and quality of wheat, and the differences of response to sulphur between the different spike type cultivars, the random block experiment was conducted with multi spike wheat cultivar Yumai 49 and heavy spike wheat cultivar Lankao 906 in Henan of China. The results showed that the suitable treatment of sulphur application could increase leaf area index(LAI), dry matter accumulation and canopy apparent photosynthesis (CAP). The application of sulphur could improve kernel per ear, fertile spikelet rate, test weight, grain weight, coarse protein , wet gluten, etc. The response of the two cultivars to sulphur application was different. The yield increasing range of Yumai 49 was more than the range of Lankao 906 after sulphur application but Yumai 49 didnt significantly responded to sulphur application in quality. Therefore the type of variety should be thought about in sulphur application .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suitable sulphur application increased leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, and canopy photosynthesis.

Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
leaf area index(LAI), dry matter accumulation and canopy apparent photosynthesis (CAP)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suitable treatment of sulphur application could increase leaf area index(LAI), dry matter accumulation and canopy apparent photosynthesis (CAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application improved kernel number, fertile spikelet rate, and test weight.

Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
kernel per ear, fertile spikelet rate, test weighte0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of sulphur could improve kernel per ear, fertile spikelet rate, test weight, grain weight, coarse protein , wet gluten, etc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application improved grain weight, coarse protein, and wet gluten.

Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
grain weight, coarse protein , wet glutene0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of sulphur could improve kernel per ear, fertile spikelet rate, test weight, grain weight, coarse protein , wet gluten, etc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield increase of Yumai 49 exceeded that of Lankao 906.

Material
Yumai 49e0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
yield increasing rangee0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
Lankao 906e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increasing range of Yumai 49 was more than the range of Lankao 906 after sulphur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yumai 49 quality did not respond significantly to sulphur.

Material
Yumai 49e0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yumai 49 didnt significantly responded to sulphur application in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise considering variety type when applying sulphur.

Outcome
type of variety should be thought about in sulphur applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the type of variety should be thought about in sulphur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.