Paper · 2012 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Effects of Silicon on Yield and Grain Quality of Wheat

Julin Gao

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was performed to investigate the effects of silicon(Si) on the plant morphological characters,grain quality,yield and its components in two spring wheat genotypes of Longmai 26 and Kehan 16 under basal fertilizer application with Si at 0 to 75 kg·hm-2.The results showed that appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16.The yield increase for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16 resulted from the increase of grain number per spike and spike number,respectively.There was no significant effect of silicon fertilizer on plant height and stem base diameter of wheat,but the spike length of Longmai 26 increased at varying degrees.There was no significant effect of silicon fertilizer on grain quality parameters of 1000 grain weight,test weight and grain protein content,but the content of wet gluten,water absorption of flour and fracture time of paste were greatly enhanced for Longmai 26,and the extension quality of paste was improved.It suggested that 30 kg·hm-2 and 60 kg·hm-2 silicon were appropriate for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16,respectively,and more silicon was not favorable for the formation of,wheat yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An appropriate dose of silicon fertilizer increased wheat grain yield, more so in Longmai 26 than in Kehan 16.

Treatment
appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizere1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield increase in Longmai 26 resulted from more grain number per spike.

Material
Longmai 26e2
Outcome
yield increasee2
Qualifier
increase of grain number per spikee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield increase for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16 resulted from the increase of grain number per spike and spike number,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–553 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield increase in Kehan 16 resulted from more spikes.

Material
Kehan 16e2
Outcome
yield increasee2
Qualifier
spike numbere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield increase for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16 resulted from the increase of grain number per spike and spike number,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer had no significant effect on wheat plant height and stem base diameter.

Treatment
silicon fertilizere3
Outcome
plant height and stem base diametere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“There was no significant effect of silicon fertilizer on plant height and stem base diameter of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike length of Longmai 26 increased with silicon fertilizer to varying degrees.

Material
Longmai 26e4
Treatment
silicon fertilizere1
Outcome
spike lengthe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e4

“but the spike length of Longmai 26 increased at varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer had no significant effect on 1000-grain weight, test weight or grain protein content of wheat.

Treatment
silicon fertilizere5
Outcome
1000 grain weight,test weight and grain protein contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant effect of silicon fertilizer on grain quality parameters of 1000 grain weight,test weight and grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Longmai 26, wet gluten content, flour water absorption and paste fracture time were greatly enhanced by silicon fertilizer.

Material
Longmai 26e6
Treatment
silicon fertilizere1
Outcome
content of wet gluten,water absorption of flour and fracture time of pastee6
Direction
greatly enhancede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e6

“the content of wet gluten,water absorption of flour and fracture time of paste were greatly enhanced for Longmai 26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer improved the extension quality of wheat paste.

Treatment
silicon fertilizere1
Outcome
extension quality of pastee7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e7

“the extension quality of paste was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1028 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 30 kg/ha for Longmai 26 and 60 kg/ha for Kehan 16 is appropriate.

Material
Longmai 26 and Kehan 16e0
Outcome
30 kg·hm-2 and 60 kg·hm-2 silicone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“appropriate dosage of silicon fertilizer increased grain yield of wheat,with more increase for Longmai 26 than that for Kehan 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–423 · show in text ↑
e0

“It suggested that 30 kg·hm-2 and 60 kg·hm-2 silicon were appropriate for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16,respectively,and more silicon was not favorable for the formation of,wheat yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1218 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More silicon was not favourable for wheat yield and quality.

Treatment
more silicone0
Outcome
wheat yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It suggested that 30 kg·hm-2 and 60 kg·hm-2 silicon were appropriate for Longmai 26 and Kehan 16,respectively,and more silicon was not favorable for the formation of,wheat yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1218 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.