Paper · 2013 · Shanghai nongye xuebao

Effects of waterlogging on growth and photosynthesis of 3 vegetable crops

Hao Tin

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of waterlogging on growth and photosynthesis of tomato,eggplant and cucumber were studied by measurement of gas exchange parameters.The results showed that five-day waterlogging heavily influenced the photosynthesis and growth of the 3 crops,and the inhibiting effects of waterlogging on tomato and cucumber were especially obvious,but eggplant was tolerant to waterlogging.All the crops' stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate presented similar variations at different waterlogging stages,and the non-stomatal factors were the major causes of their photosynthesis decreasing in waterlogging.Waterlogging resulted in decrease of their chlorophyll contents,and their carotenoid contents could be used as an important indicator of plant tolerance to waterlogging stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day waterlogging especially inhibited tomato photosynthesis and growth.

Treatment
five-day waterlogginge0
Outcome
photosynthesis and growthe0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five-day waterlogging heavily influenced the photosynthesis and growth of the 3 crops,and the inhibiting effects of waterlogging on tomato and cucumber were especially obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day waterlogging especially inhibited cucumber photosynthesis and growth.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
five-day waterlogginge0
Outcome
photosynthesis and growthe0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five-day waterlogging heavily influenced the photosynthesis and growth of the 3 crops,and the inhibiting effects of waterlogging on tomato and cucumber were especially obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eggplant was tolerant to waterlogging.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Outcome
tolerant to waterlogginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eggplant was tolerant to waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tomato stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and net photosynthetic rate varied similarly across waterlogging stages.

Outcome
stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
different waterlogging stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the crops' stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate presented similar variations at different waterlogging stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

eggplant stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and net photosynthetic rate varied similarly across waterlogging stages.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
different waterlogging stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the crops' stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate presented similar variations at different waterlogging stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cucumber stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and net photosynthetic rate varied similarly across waterlogging stages.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
different waterlogging stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the crops' stomatal conductance,transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate presented similar variations at different waterlogging stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tomato photosynthesis decreased under waterlogging mainly because of non-stomatal factors.

Outcome
photosynthesis decreasinge0
Qualifier
non-stomatal factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the non-stomatal factors were the major causes of their photosynthesis decreasing in waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

eggplant photosynthesis decreased under waterlogging mainly because of non-stomatal factors.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
photosynthesis decreasinge0
Qualifier
non-stomatal factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the non-stomatal factors were the major causes of their photosynthesis decreasing in waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cucumber photosynthesis decreased under waterlogging mainly because of non-stomatal factors.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
photosynthesis decreasinge0
Qualifier
non-stomatal factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the non-stomatal factors were the major causes of their photosynthesis decreasing in waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased tomato chlorophyll content.

Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging resulted in decrease of their chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased eggplant chlorophyll content.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging resulted in decrease of their chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased cucumber chlorophyll content.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging resulted in decrease of their chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content was proposed as an indicator of vegetable crop waterlogging tolerance.

Outcome
carotenoid contents could be used as an important indicator of plant tolerance to waterlogging stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their carotenoid contents could be used as an important indicator of plant tolerance to waterlogging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato,eggplant and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–88 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · physiology: pigments · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

flooding · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.