Abstract
Characteristic of sulfur absorption of HOM,HSM and effects of sulfur amount applied on their kernel quality and yield were studied.Results indicated that sulfur absorption in period before flowering was 57.53% of the total sulfur absorption.There was bigger sulfur accumulation strength after flowering.Sulfur absorption per hectare of Changdan26,Yedan13,Gaoyou1 was 34.50,34.92,32.46 kilogram,respectively.Yield could be increased,and kernel quality improved after sulfur fertilizer applied.Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectare made oil percentage and protein content of kernel increased 9.05% and 6.88% than Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer),respectively;protein quality improved,while starch content in kernel was little decreased.When sulfur fertilizer added to 90 kg/hm 2 (S 2),there was some increase in oil percentage and protein content of kernel,and zein in protein increased ,protein quality decreased.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur absorption before flowering was 57.53% of total sulfur absorption in maize.
- Organ / stage
- period before floweringe1
- Outcome
- sulfur absorption in period before floweringe1
- Value
- 57.53%e1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e1“sulfur absorption in period before flowering was 57.53% of the total sulfur absorption”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur accumulation strength was bigger after flowering than before.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e2“There was bigger sulfur accumulation strength after flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur absorption per hectare of Changdan26 was 34.50 kilogram.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e3“Sulfur absorption per hectare of Changdan26,Yedan13,Gaoyou1 was 34.50,34.92,32.46 kilogram,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur absorption per hectare of Yedan13 was 34.92 kilogram.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e3“Sulfur absorption per hectare of Changdan26,Yedan13,Gaoyou1 was 34.50,34.92,32.46 kilogram,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur absorption per hectare of Gaoyou1 was 32.46 kilogram.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e3“Sulfur absorption per hectare of Changdan26,Yedan13,Gaoyou1 was 34.50,34.92,32.46 kilogram,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield could be increased after sulfur fertilizer application.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e4“Yield could be increased,and kernel quality improved after sulfur fertilizer applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Kernel quality improved after sulfur fertilizer application.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e4“Yield could be increased,and kernel quality improved after sulfur fertilizer applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 22.5 kg sulfur per hectare increased kernel oil percentage by 9.05% relative to no sulfur fertilizer.
- Treatment
- Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectaree5
- Outcome
- oil percentagee5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 9.05%e5
- Comparator
- Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e5“Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectare made oil percentage and protein content of kernel increased 9.05% and 6.88% than Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer),respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 22.5 kg sulfur per hectare increased kernel protein content by 6.88% relative to no sulfur fertilizer.
- Treatment
- Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectaree5
- Outcome
- protein content of kernele5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 6.88%e5
- Comparator
- Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e5“Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectare made oil percentage and protein content of kernel increased 9.05% and 6.88% than Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer),respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein quality improved with 22.5 kg sulfur per hectare.
- Treatment
- Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectaree5
- Outcome
- protein qualitye6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Comparator
- Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e5“Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectare made oil percentage and protein content of kernel increased 9.05% and 6.88% than Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer),respectively”
e6“protein quality improved,while starch content in kernel was little decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Starch content in kernel decreased slightly with 22.5 kg sulfur per hectare.
- Treatment
- Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectaree5
- Outcome
- starch content in kernele6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Qualifier
- littlee6
- Comparator
- Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e5“Applied 22.5 kilogram sulfur per hectare made oil percentage and protein content of kernel increased 9.05% and 6.88% than Sck(not applied sulfur fertilizer),respectively”
e6“protein quality improved,while starch content in kernel was little decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
At 90 kg/hm2 sulfur, oil percentage and protein content of kernel showed some increase.
- Treatment
- sulfur fertilizer added to 90 kg/hm 2 (S 2)e7
- Outcome
- oil percentage and protein content of kernele7
- Direction
- increasee7
- Qualifier
- somee7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e7“When sulfur fertilizer added to 90 kg/hm 2 (S 2),there was some increase in oil percentage and protein content of kernel”
Claim · model-written summary
At 90 kg/hm2 sulfur, zein in protein increased.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e7“When sulfur fertilizer added to 90 kg/hm 2 (S 2),there was some increase in oil percentage and protein content of kernel”
e1“zein in protein increased”
Claim · model-written summary
At 90 kg/hm2 sulfur, protein quality decreased.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“high oil maize”
e7“When sulfur fertilizer added to 90 kg/hm 2 (S 2),there was some increase in oil percentage and protein content of kernel”
e6“protein quality decreased”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →sulfur atom · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 236 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
258 papers more in this group
See all 262 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.