Paper · 2009 · Grassland and Turf

Effect of NPK combination on forage yield and nutrient accumulation under sudangrass and ryegrass regime

Xiaokun Li

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field trial was carried out to study the effect of NPK combination on forage yield and nutrient accumulation in sudangrass and ryegrass rotation.The results indicated that the total fresh matter yield of NPK combination were the highest(162.7t/hm2)among all treatments.In which,the fresh matter yield of sudangrass was 102.3 t/hm2,and it was 352.7%,356.7%,28.2% and 13.9% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments respectively.The fresh matter yield of ryegrass was 60.4 t/hm2,and it was 344.1%,255.3%,24.8% and 25.3% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments respectively.In NPK treatment,the average daily accumulation rate of forage dry matter was 65.2 kg/hm2,it was 215.0%,197.5%,22.0% and 9.6% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments in whole growth period,and they were 104.5 kg/hm2 and 36.9 kg/hm2 for sudangrass and ryegrass respectively.NPK combination obviously improved the nutrient accumulation in forage,and the accumulation amounts of N,P2O5 and K2O were 500 kg/hm2,210 kg/hm2 and 1196 kg/hm2,and the average daily accumulation rates in the whole period for N,P2O5 and K2O was 1.37 kg/hm2,0.58 kg/hm2 and 3.29 kg/hm2 respectively,in which,they were 2.12 kg/hm2,0.79 kg/hm2 and 4.16 kg/hm2 for sudangrass and 0.84 kg/hm2,0.43 kg/hm2 and 2.66 kg/hm2 respectively for ryegrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced the highest total fresh matter yield, 162.7 t/hm2.

Taxon
sudangrass and ryegrassLoliumSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
NPK combinatione0
Outcome
total fresh matter yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
162.7t/hm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total fresh matter yield of NPK combination were the highest(162.7t/hm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–252 · show in text ↑
t0

“sudangrass and ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass fresh matter yield under NPK was 102.3 t/hm2 and exceeded CK, PK, NK and NP.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
NPKt0
Outcome
fresh matter yield of sudangrasse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
102.3 t/hm2e0
Comparator
CK,PK,NK and NP treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh matter yield of sudangrass was 102.3 t/hm2,and it was 352.7%,356.7%,28.2% and 13.9% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“NPK combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass fresh matter yield under NPK was 60.4 t/hm2 and exceeded CK, PK, NK and NP.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Treatment
NPK combinationt0
Outcome
fresh matter yield of ryegrasse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
60.4 t/hm2e0
Comparator
CK,PK,NK and NP treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh matter yield of ryegrass was 60.4 t/hm2,and it was 344.1%,255.3%,24.8% and 25.3% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“NPK combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK average daily forage dry matter accumulation was 65.2 kg/hm2, higher than CK, PK, NK and NP.

Taxon
sudangrass and ryegrassLoliumSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
NPK combinationt1
Outcome
average daily accumulation rate of forage dry mattere0
Direction
more thane0
Value
65.2 kg/hm2e0
Comparator
CK,PK,NK and NP treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average daily accumulation rate of forage dry matter was 65.2 kg/hm2,it was 215.0%,197.5%,22.0% and 9.6% more than that of CK,PK,NK and NP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“sudangrass and ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“NPK combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass daily dry matter accumulation under NPK was 104.5 kg/hm2.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome
average daily accumulation rate of forage dry mattere1
Value
104.5 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“104.5 kg/hm2 and 36.9 kg/hm2 for sudangrass and ryegrass respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“NPK combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“average daily accumulation rate of forage dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass daily dry matter accumulation under NPK was 36.9 kg/hm2.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Outcome
average daily accumulation rate of forage dry mattere1
Value
36.9 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“104.5 kg/hm2 and 36.9 kg/hm2 for sudangrass and ryegrass respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“average daily accumulation rate of forage dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK improved forage nutrient accumulation.

Taxon
sudangrass and ryegrassLoliumSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
NPK combinatione0
Outcome
nutrient accumulation in foragee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK combination obviously improved the nutrient accumulation in forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“sudangrass and ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · LoliumPositive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · yield · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · LoliumPositive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · yield · LoliumPositive and negative results

50 papers: 38 positive, 12 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.