Paper · 2008 · Zhongguo tangliao

Effect Trial of Rongdafeng Paste Fertilizer in Sugarcane Field

Zhi-Ming Luo

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rongdafeng paste fertilizer was applied to sugarcane fields. The trial results showed that the fertilizer may promote sugarcane growth, thicken stalk and increase cane stalks yield by 5.62%-9.17%. At the same time, it could improve quality of sugarcane juice, increase by 0.16%-0.85% sucrose content of sugarcane and reduce cost. Rongdafeng paste fertilizer was sprayed one to two times with 300 times diluent concentrations when control Sesamia inferens(Walker)at the March or April and control Ceratovacuna lanigera Zehntner at the July or August month.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rongdafeng paste fertilizer may promote sugarcane growth.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
sugarcane growthe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilizer may promote sugarcane growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer may thicken sugarcane stalks.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
stalke0
Direction
thickene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilizer may promote sugarcane growth, thicken stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer increased cane stalk yield by 5.62%-9.17%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Rongdafeng paste fertilizert0
Outcome
cane stalks yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.62%-9.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase cane stalks yield by 5.62%-9.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rongdafeng Paste Fertilizer in Sugarcane Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer may improve sugarcane juice quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Rongdafeng paste fertilizert0
Outcome
quality of sugarcane juicee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it could improve quality of sugarcane juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rongdafeng paste fertilizer was applied to sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer increased sugarcane sucrose content by 0.16%-0.85%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Rongdafeng paste fertilizert0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.16%-0.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase by 0.16%-0.85% sucrose content of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rongdafeng paste fertilizer was applied to sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer reduced cost.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Rongdafeng Paste Fertilizert0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduce cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rongdafeng Paste Fertilizer in Sugarcane Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.