Paper · 2014 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effects of Nitrogen Amount and Transplanting Density on the Yield and N Use Rate of Hybrid Rice Under Hilly Area of Southern Henan Province

Lei Zhen-sha

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of the amount of nitrogen fertilizer and transplanting density on yield and N application rate of rice in hilly area of South Henan were studied. Two hybrid rice varieties, Gangyou1237 and II-you 838 were used as test materials.The results showed that N level and transplanting density affected rice yield. The average absorption rate of the rice yield increased 588~2 579 kg / hm2 and 13~424 kg / hm2 at the same N level with high planting density(240 000 plants / hm2)comparing with the low density(180 000 plants / hm2) of the two rice cultivars. The rice yield had turning points of nitrogen application with low planting density, but no turning points with high planting density. NUE(nitrogen recovery efficiency) in treatment of high transplanting density was higher than that of low transplanting density by 4.3~11.5 percent and 3.1~27.5 percent at the same N level. NUE was increased with the increase of nitrogen fertilizer at the same density. It is indicated that increasing plant density and deceasing nitrogen fertilizer application significantly increased NUE. The combination of fertilization and transplanting density was an important ways for increasing efficacy of applying fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level and transplanting density affected rice yield.

Outcome
rice yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N level and transplanting density affected rice yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–318 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same nitrogen level, high density increased yield for one cultivar by 588~2 579 kg / hm2.

Treatment
high planting density(240 000 plants / hm2)e0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
588~2 579 kg / hm2e0
Comparator
low density(180 000 plants / hm2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average absorption rate of the rice yield increased 588~2 579 kg / hm2 and 13~424 kg / hm2 at the same N level with high planting density(240 000 plants / hm2)comparing with the low density(180 000 plants / hm2) of the two rice cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–561 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same nitrogen level, high density increased yield for the other cultivar by 13~424 kg / hm2.

Treatment
high planting density(240 000 plants / hm2)e0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13~424 kg / hm2e0
Comparator
low density(180 000 plants / hm2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average absorption rate of the rice yield increased 588~2 579 kg / hm2 and 13~424 kg / hm2 at the same N level with high planting density(240 000 plants / hm2)comparing with the low density(180 000 plants / hm2) of the two rice cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–561 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield had nitrogen application turning points under low planting density.

Outcome
rice yield had turning pointse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice yield had turning points of nitrogen application with low planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–645 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield had no nitrogen application turning point under high planting density.

Outcome
no turning pointse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but no turning points with high planting density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–696 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density raised nitrogen recovery efficiency by 4.3~11.5 percent for one cultivar.

Treatment
high transplanting densitye0
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.3~11.5 percente0
Comparator
low transplanting densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE(nitrogen recovery efficiency) in treatment of high transplanting density was higher than that of low transplanting density by 4.3~11.5 percent and 3.1~27.5 percent at the same N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–885 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density raised nitrogen recovery efficiency by 3.1~27.5 percent for the other cultivar.

Treatment
high transplanting densitye0
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.1~27.5 percente0
Comparator
low transplanting densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE(nitrogen recovery efficiency) in treatment of high transplanting density was higher than that of low transplanting density by 4.3~11.5 percent and 3.1~27.5 percent at the same N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–885 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen recovery efficiency increased with nitrogen fertilizer at the same density.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE was increased with the increase of nitrogen fertilizer at the same density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–965 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density and reducing fertilizer significantly increased nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Treatment
increasing plant density and deceasing nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing plant density and deceasing nitrogen fertilizer application significantly increased NUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1086 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify combining fertilization and density as a way to improve fertilizer use efficacy.

Outcome
combination of fertilization and transplanting densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of fertilization and transplanting density was an important ways for increasing efficacy of applying fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1215 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑

density · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.