Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing plant density and reducing fertilizer significantly increased nitrogen recovery efficiency.

A claim from Effects of Nitrogen Amount and Transplanting Density on the Yield and N Use Rate of Hybrid Rice Under Hilly Area of Southern Henan Province · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density and reducing fertilizer significantly increased nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Treatment
increasing plant density and deceasing nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing plant density and deceasing nitrogen fertilizer application significantly increased NUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1086
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Amount and Transplanting Density on the Yield and N Use Rate of Hybrid Rice Under Hilly Area of Southern Henan Province

Lei Zhen-sha Hubei nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-17c69d0e5b9b3dfa5f908d99cd5b95fc234191e1d1d55d0f6fbc17f8a865f09b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.