Paper · 2008 · Northern Horticulture

Effects of Different Topdressing Practices on The Fruit Yield and Quality of Organic Peach

Qing Chen

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of the topdressing of different organic fertilizer,bio-fertilizer and foliar fertilizer in organic peach orchard on the growth and quality of 5-year-old peach(variety: Beijing No 24).The results showed that topdressing of these fertilizers could significantly increased peach yield on the basis of basal application of 45 t/hm2 of sheep dung,especially in organic fertilizer topdressing,together with foliar spraying treatment.However,there were no significant differences in the total sugar and soluble solids content of peach fruit among different treatments.All topdressing treatments could significantly reduce the Vitamin C content of fruit,and increased fruit hardness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing significantly increased peach yield over basal sheep dung application.

Treatment
topdressing of these fertilizerse0
Outcome
peach yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
basal application of 45 t/hm2 of sheep dunge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing of these fertilizers could significantly increased peach yield on the basis of basal application of 45 t/hm2 of sheep dung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer topdressing with foliar spray particularly increased peach yield.

Treatment
organic fertilizer topdressing,together with foliar spraying treatmente0
Outcome
peach yieldt1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“especially in organic fertilizer topdressing,together with foliar spraying treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“peach yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach total sugar and soluble solids content did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
total sugar and soluble solids contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
different treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in the total sugar and soluble solids content of peach fruit among different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All topdressing treatments significantly reduced peach fruit Vitamin C content.

Treatment
All topdressing treatmentse0
Outcome
Vitamin C content of fruite0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All topdressing treatments could significantly reduce the Vitamin C content of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All topdressing treatments increased peach fruit hardness.

Treatment
All topdressing treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit hardnesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All topdressing treatments could significantly reduce the Vitamin C content of fruit,and increased fruit hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.