Abstract
Pot experiments were conducted to investigate the cultivar difference of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn concentration and their types in triticale grain in response to nitrogen application.31 triticale varieties with different inheritance background were used as experimental materials.Low and normal content nitrogen were supplied.The results showed that: 1) Under normal nitrogen supply,Fe and Zn content in triticale grain were significant higher than that of low nitrogen supply.The differences of Mn and Cu content under two nitrogen levels were not significant.Significant difference of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents in triticale grain were observed under the same nitrogen levels.The coefficient of variation was from 15.07% to 38.69%.2) The sensitivity discrepancy in view of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents existed in the grain of triticale varieties under nitrogen supply.Insensitive type,intermediate type and sensitive type were classified based on sensitivity discrepancy of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents under nitrogen supply.3) According to correlation analysis,no positive significant correlation was observed between Fe and Mn content and 1000-grain weight.The results showed a highly significant positive correlation between the content of Cu,Zn and 1000-grain weight(the correlation coefficient were 0.45 and 0.44,respectively).The content of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn had a highly significant positive correlation to nitrogen content in triticale grain(the correlation coefficient were 0.34,0.55,0.47 and 0.71,respectively).The conclusion could be used as a reference for excavation and application of advantaged gene in triticale.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Normal nitrogen significantly increased grain Fe relative to low nitrogen.
- Taxon
- triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- normal nitrogen supplye0
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- low nitrogen supplye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under normal nitrogen supply,Fe and Zn content in triticale grain were significant higher than that of low nitrogen supply.”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal nitrogen significantly increased grain Zn content in triticale grain relative to low nitrogen.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- normal nitrogen supplye0
- Outcome
- Zn content in triticale graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- low nitrogen supplye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under normal nitrogen supply,Fe and Zn content in triticale grain were significant higher than that of low nitrogen supply.”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain Mn did not differ significantly between nitrogen levels.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- two nitrogen levelse0
- Outcome
- Mne0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The differences of Mn and Cu content under two nitrogen levels were not significant.”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain Cu content did not differ significantly between nitrogen levels.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- two nitrogen levelse0
- Outcome
- Cu contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The differences of Mn and Cu content under two nitrogen levels were not significant.”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn contents varied significantly among varieties.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents in triticale graine0
- Direction
- Significant differencee0
- Value
- 15.07% to 38.69%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant difference of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents in triticale grain were observed under the same nitrogen levels.The coefficient of variation was from 15.07% to 38.69%.”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed in mineral-content sensitivity to nitrogen supply.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- sensitivity discrepancy in view of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The sensitivity discrepancy in view of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents existed in the grain of triticale varieties under nitrogen supply.”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties were classified as insensitive, intermediate or sensitive.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Outcome
- Insensitive type,intermediate type and sensitive typee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Insensitive type,intermediate type and sensitive type were classified based on sensitivity discrepancy of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn contents under nitrogen supply.”
e1“grain of triticale varieties under nitrogen supply”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe content lacked a significant positive correlation with 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Organ / stage
- graine1
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- no positive significant correlatione0
- Qualifier
- 1000-grain weighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no positive significant correlation was observed between Fe and Mn content and 1000-grain weight”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn content content lacked a significant positive correlation with 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Organ / stage
- graine1
- Outcome
- Mn contente0
- Direction
- no positive significant correlatione0
- Qualifier
- 1000-grain weighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no positive significant correlation was observed between Fe and Mn content and 1000-grain weight”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
content of Cu correlated positively with 1000-grain weight (r=0.45).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Organ / stage
- graine1
- Outcome
- content of Cue0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.45e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highly significant positive correlation between the content of Cu,Zn and 1000-grain weight(the correlation coefficient were 0.45 and 0.44,respectively)”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn correlated positively with 1000-grain weight (r=0.44).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Organ / stage
- graine1
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.44e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highly significant positive correlation between the content of Cu,Zn and 1000-grain weight(the correlation coefficient were 0.45 and 0.44,respectively)”
e1“in triticale grain were significant higher”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
content of Fe correlated positively with grain nitrogen content (r=0.34).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Compound
- nitrogene0
- Outcome
- content of Fee0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.34e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn had a highly significant positive correlation to nitrogen content in triticale grain(the correlation coefficient were 0.34,0.55,0.47 and 0.71,respectively).”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn correlated positively with grain nitrogen content (r=0.55).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Compound
- nitrogene0
- Outcome
- Mne0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.55e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn had a highly significant positive correlation to nitrogen content in triticale grain(the correlation coefficient were 0.34,0.55,0.47 and 0.71,respectively).”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu correlated positively with grain nitrogen content (r=0.47).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Compound
- nitrogene0
- Outcome
- Cue0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.47e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn had a highly significant positive correlation to nitrogen content in triticale grain(the correlation coefficient were 0.34,0.55,0.47 and 0.71,respectively).”
t0“Triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn correlated positively with grain nitrogen content (r=0.71).
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Compound
- nitrogene0
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
- Value
- 0.71e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn had a highly significant positive correlation to nitrogen content in triticale grain(the correlation coefficient were 0.34,0.55,0.47 and 0.71,respectively).”
t0“Triticale grain”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.